Comments on: Judge: holding “Cops Ahead” sign to warn motorists may be protected speech

By: Rxc

Rxc — Wed, 15 May 2019 01:14:55 +0000

Every speed limit sign “interferes” with police enforcement of speed limits.

How can it ever be illegal to tell people that they should obey the law?

By: ras

ras — Tue, 14 May 2019 20:52:42 +0000

I guess “no guns allowed” signs are illegal now too, right?

By: Heresolong

Heresolong — Tue, 14 May 2019 12:39:16 +0000

If the purpose of having the police setting a speed patrol is to reduce speed, his sign accomplishes the same purpose.

If the purpose of the patrol is to raise revenue, then his sign interferes with their duties.

By: SPO

SPO — Tue, 14 May 2019 11:55:41 +0000

What sort of society arrests for this?

By: Bob Lipton

Bob Lipton — Tue, 14 May 2019 10:09:18 +0000

What if there were no cops ahead? What if the point was to get people to drive slower on this particular stretch of road? Wouldn’t “Cops Ahead” be more effective than “Reduce Speed”?

Bob