<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Some read it for the articles, some for the settlement $$$	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/some-read-it-for-the-articles-some-for-the-settlement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/some-read-it-for-the-articles-some-for-the-settlement/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 22:07:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cecil		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/some-read-it-for-the-articles-some-for-the-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-354732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cecil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73287#comment-354732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[there is a technical definition of legally blind.  Legally blind persons have some sight, accuity less than 20-200 or with a range narrower than 20 degrees or something similar.  My mother was legally blind due to early onset glaucoma.  Me, on the other hand, I am totally blind as a result of having both eyes removed.  &quot;See&quot; the potential differences?  Some legally blind persons can see well enough to pass a visual accuity driving test, unfortunately they can only see things directly in front of them and even small variances outside of directly in front even at distance goes outside their field of view.  Then there is visually impaired...    I could not tell you who sets that standard, although I know the IRS follows it...  Maybe librarian of congress?  After all, it is used to determine eligibility for talking books...  :DBut hey, there are lawyers here, I am sure someone knows or knows how to find out better than an interested spectator.
:D]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a technical definition of legally blind.  Legally blind persons have some sight, accuity less than 20-200 or with a range narrower than 20 degrees or something similar.  My mother was legally blind due to early onset glaucoma.  Me, on the other hand, I am totally blind as a result of having both eyes removed.  &#8220;See&#8221; the potential differences?  Some legally blind persons can see well enough to pass a visual accuity driving test, unfortunately they can only see things directly in front of them and even small variances outside of directly in front even at distance goes outside their field of view.  Then there is visually impaired&#8230;    I could not tell you who sets that standard, although I know the IRS follows it&#8230;  Maybe librarian of congress?  After all, it is used to determine eligibility for talking books&#8230;  :DBut hey, there are lawyers here, I am sure someone knows or knows how to find out better than an interested spectator.<br />
😀</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: e		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/some-read-it-for-the-articles-some-for-the-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-354664</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 16:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73287#comment-354664</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, how does one distinguish between a &quot;Legally Blind&quot; individual and any other blind individual? Can someone be illegally blind?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, how does one distinguish between a &#8220;Legally Blind&#8221; individual and any other blind individual? Can someone be illegally blind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: &#34;He only reads it for the articles.&#34; - The Locker Room - The Locker Room		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/some-read-it-for-the-articles-some-for-the-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-354659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#34;He only reads it for the articles.&#34; - The Locker Room - The Locker Room]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 16:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73287#comment-354659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] H/T: Walter Olson [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] H/T: Walter Olson [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: My Dog Bites Better Than Yours		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/some-read-it-for-the-articles-some-for-the-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-354648</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My Dog Bites Better Than Yours]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 19:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73287#comment-354648</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would seem the fault is with his screen-reading software, not the website.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem the fault is with his screen-reading software, not the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cc		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/some-read-it-for-the-articles-some-for-the-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-354647</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 19:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73287#comment-354647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When the ADA was written, no one imagined it would be used this way. In this case, are we supposed to believe he is visiting Playboy for the articles?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the ADA was written, no one imagined it would be used this way. In this case, are we supposed to believe he is visiting Playboy for the articles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/05/some-read-it-for-the-articles-some-for-the-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-354646</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 19:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73287#comment-354646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While I was in high school and through college, I worked part time in Public Library. They had a subscription to Playboy in Braille!

I found this article about the Braille edition: 

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2019/04/09/playboy-braille/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I was in high school and through college, I worked part time in Public Library. They had a subscription to Playboy in Braille!</p>
<p>I found this article about the Braille edition: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.thevintagenews.com/2019/04/09/playboy-braille/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.thevintagenews.com/2019/04/09/playboy-braille/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
