<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: No more poor relation: SCOTUS accords Bill of Rights handling to takings claims	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/06/no-more-poor-relation-scotus-accords-bill-of-rights-handling-to-takings-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/06/no-more-poor-relation-scotus-accords-bill-of-rights-handling-to-takings-claims/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/06/no-more-poor-relation-scotus-accords-bill-of-rights-handling-to-takings-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-355005</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73379#comment-355005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If this means more &quot;regulatory takings&quot; claims get rejecred on the merits so people quit trying to claim new &quot;rights&quot; in their property I&#039;m all for it. I don&#039;t think that&#039;s going to happen, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this means more &#8220;regulatory takings&#8221; claims get rejecred on the merits so people quit trying to claim new &#8220;rights&#8221; in their property I&#8217;m all for it. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s going to happen, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
