Comments on: Bad reasons to push for new federal laws: Prager v. YouTube

By: Billy

Billy — Sat, 24 Aug 2019 23:34:42 +0000

If you’re not signed in and over 18, restricted mode will automatically be on anyway. If you’re on a school issued Chromebook or laptop, it means you may be able to watch this content. It’s also not like they’re showing graphic images or describing murder in great detail. Any person under 18 that actually watches what is generally bland and churchworthy, will definitely be okay with this channel and it’s content in relation to it’s “graphic” nature.

By: SVT

SVT — Mon, 12 Aug 2019 00:31:49 +0000

“The PragerU shows at issue did have some content about topics like rape, murder, and genocide that might disturb younger children.”

The list of restricted videos belies this statement. And you conveniently ignore the demonetization issue.

I expect better of overlawyered.

By: En Passant

En Passant — Thu, 08 Aug 2019 18:14:32 +0000

If Mr. Prager wants to make sure his videos are published in a forum as easily accessed by adults as youtube, he could follow the example of InRangeTV, a publisher of firearms related videos which had some 144,000 youtube subscribers, but suddenly in early 2018 found its videos banned by youtube.

InRangeTV simply began posting its videos on PornHub, which did not ban them.

Mr. Prager might even find that his videos reach a new audience that strongly supports his anti-censorship views.