<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More highlights from &#8220;How To Become a Federal Criminal&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/08/more-highlights-from-how-to-become-a-federal-criminal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/08/more-highlights-from-how-to-become-a-federal-criminal/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2019 03:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/08/more-highlights-from-how-to-become-a-federal-criminal/comment-page-1/#comment-355693</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2019 03:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73497#comment-355693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’m a bit disappointed to see items like no checks less than a dollar when the quoted section makes clear it only applies to notes intended to circulate. If some of the book is repeating 110 year old bad journalism (https://books.google.com/books?id=7hlLAQAAMAAJ&#038;pg=PA590&#038;lpg=PA590&#038;dq=check+less+than+a+dollar+circulate&#038;source=bl&#038;ots=K6jKiwEDr9&#038;sig=ACfU3U2azuIW6dhfZlNb6WQyNhqKT6J5Ig&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;ved=2ahUKEwiBzMf8wIvkAhV4JDQIHR3qAlcQ6AEwEHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&#038;q&#038;f=false) how can I trust the other parts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a bit disappointed to see items like no checks less than a dollar when the quoted section makes clear it only applies to notes intended to circulate. If some of the book is repeating 110 year old bad journalism (<a href="https://books.google.com/books?id=7hlLAQAAMAAJ&#038;pg=PA590&#038;lpg=PA590&#038;dq=check+less+than+a+dollar+circulate&#038;source=bl&#038;ots=K6jKiwEDr9&#038;sig=ACfU3U2azuIW6dhfZlNb6WQyNhqKT6J5Ig&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;ved=2ahUKEwiBzMf8wIvkAhV4JDQIHR3qAlcQ6AEwEHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&#038;q&#038;f=false" rel="nofollow ugc">https://books.google.com/books?id=7hlLAQAAMAAJ&#038;pg=PA590&#038;lpg=PA590&#038;dq=check+less+than+a+dollar+circulate&#038;source=bl&#038;ots=K6jKiwEDr9&#038;sig=ACfU3U2azuIW6dhfZlNb6WQyNhqKT6J5Ig&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;ved=2ahUKEwiBzMf8wIvkAhV4JDQIHR3qAlcQ6AEwEHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&#038;q&#038;f=false</a>) how can I trust the other parts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
