Comments on: San Francisco: forget that NRA contractor blacklist https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/10/san-francisco-forget-that-nra-contractor-blacklist/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 02 Oct 2019 15:29:52 +0000 hourly 1 By: swirsky https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/10/san-francisco-forget-that-nra-contractor-blacklist/comment-page-1/#comment-356277 Wed, 02 Oct 2019 15:29:52 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73636#comment-356277 My little 5 person (and extremely diverse!) consulting company is a member of the NRA (along with about a dozen other organizations). I can’t imagine how San Francisco can think banning companies like mine is a Good Idea.

]]> By: Dave https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/10/san-francisco-forget-that-nra-contractor-blacklist/comment-page-1/#comment-356275 Wed, 02 Oct 2019 13:25:04 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73636#comment-356275 The city possesses its cake and is eating it, too.
The message has been sent…whether “binding” or not, fair warning to anyone who belongs to or contributes to the NRA that the city will avoid doing business with them.

]]> By: Richard https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/10/san-francisco-forget-that-nra-contractor-blacklist/comment-page-1/#comment-356270 Tue, 01 Oct 2019 20:06:19 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73636#comment-356270 In reply to Bob Lipton.

Why is that “clear” rather than the indicated reason that processes already subject to law or ordinance don’t change based on a BOS Resolution.

]]> By: Bob Lipton https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/10/san-francisco-forget-that-nra-contractor-blacklist/comment-page-1/#comment-356268 Tue, 01 Oct 2019 19:12:47 +0000 https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73636#comment-356268 If the city’s contracting policies and standards have not and will not change as a result of the resolution, then clearly they are already in compliance with the resolution and therefore illegal, immoral, unconstitutional and fattening.

Bob

]]>