<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Not unconstitutional for county to jump off probation-for-profit carousel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/12/not-unconstitutional-for-county-to-back-out-of-probation-for-profit-dealings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/12/not-unconstitutional-for-county-to-back-out-of-probation-for-profit-dealings/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/12/not-unconstitutional-for-county-to-back-out-of-probation-for-profit-dealings/comment-page-1/#comment-357163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73815#comment-357163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reading the decision, it looked to me like Rule 11 sanctions against the probation company should have been imposed.  The case was that weak.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reading the decision, it looked to me like Rule 11 sanctions against the probation company should have been imposed.  The case was that weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
