<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: January 29 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MattS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-357676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MattS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73859#comment-357676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-357669&quot;&gt;Wfjag&lt;/a&gt;.

Somehow I get the impression that &quot;appreciate&quot; was a poor word choice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-357669">Wfjag</a>.</p>
<p>Somehow I get the impression that &#8220;appreciate&#8221; was a poor word choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wfjag		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-357669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wfjag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 08:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73859#comment-357669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-357661&quot;&gt;SPO&lt;/a&gt;.

As I appreciate the Michigan Court of Appeals decision in the Wood case, if someone writes a letter to the editor about a matter in litigation, that would be a violation of the criminal jury tampering statute.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-357661">SPO</a>.</p>
<p>As I appreciate the Michigan Court of Appeals decision in the Wood case, if someone writes a letter to the editor about a matter in litigation, that would be a violation of the criminal jury tampering statute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/01/january-29-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-357661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73859#comment-357661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With respect to the Michigan case, it seems to me to be a very easy case--citizens can advise other citizens of their powers.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to the Michigan case, it seems to me to be a very easy case&#8211;citizens can advise other citizens of their powers.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
