<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: First Amendment might not let Mississippi licensing board go after online map service	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/first-amendment-might-not-let-mississippi-licensing-board-go-after-online-map-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/first-amendment-might-not-let-mississippi-licensing-board-go-after-online-map-service/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/first-amendment-might-not-let-mississippi-licensing-board-go-after-online-map-service/comment-page-1/#comment-358623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73943#comment-358623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/first-amendment-might-not-let-mississippi-licensing-board-go-after-online-map-service/comment-page-1/#comment-358620&quot;&gt;Bruce Hyman&lt;/a&gt;.

My only question there---did Oregon&#039;s Professional Engineering Society &quot;lose&quot;?  I think not.  It sent a message--one that won&#039;t soon be forgotten.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/first-amendment-might-not-let-mississippi-licensing-board-go-after-online-map-service/comment-page-1/#comment-358620">Bruce Hyman</a>.</p>
<p>My only question there&#8212;did Oregon&#8217;s Professional Engineering Society &#8220;lose&#8221;?  I think not.  It sent a message&#8211;one that won&#8217;t soon be forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce Hyman		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/first-amendment-might-not-let-mississippi-licensing-board-go-after-online-map-service/comment-page-1/#comment-358620</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Hyman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73943#comment-358620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oregon&#039;s Professional Engineering society lost a suit against a man with a graduate engineering degree who identified as such. he did *not* claim to be a licensed PE and the matter in question had nothing to do with the responsibilities of a PE.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oregon&#8217;s Professional Engineering society lost a suit against a man with a graduate engineering degree who identified as such. he did *not* claim to be a licensed PE and the matter in question had nothing to do with the responsibilities of a PE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/first-amendment-might-not-let-mississippi-licensing-board-go-after-online-map-service/comment-page-1/#comment-358608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2020 13:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73943#comment-358608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is an easy case and a hard case.  First, the hard--clearly. the State has the right to regulate &quot;surveying&quot;---but what is surveying?  (Just like what is golf--for people who have read Scalia&#039;s classic dissent.)  

But that question doesn&#039;t need to be answered.  The easy question is whether people have a right to take publicly available legal descriptions and superimpose them on a map for a fee.  And the answer is yes they do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an easy case and a hard case.  First, the hard&#8211;clearly. the State has the right to regulate &#8220;surveying&#8221;&#8212;but what is surveying?  (Just like what is golf&#8211;for people who have read Scalia&#8217;s classic dissent.)  </p>
<p>But that question doesn&#8217;t need to be answered.  The easy question is whether people have a right to take publicly available legal descriptions and superimpose them on a map for a fee.  And the answer is yes they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
