<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: May 2003 archives	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/may-2003-archives-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Peremptory juror challenges		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/may-2003-archives-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-41961</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peremptory juror challenges]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?page_id=6996#comment-41961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] discussion. Earlier mentions on this website are here, including a discussion of England&#8217;s near-abolition of the practice in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] discussion. Earlier mentions on this website are here, including a discussion of England&#8217;s near-abolition of the practice in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
