<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>James Frey &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/james-frey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:25:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Microblog 2008-01-04</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/microblog-2008-01-04/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/microblog-2008-01-04/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA filing mills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charitable trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colleges and universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feeing frenzy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service animals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Must stores let in &#8220;social support&#8221; goats? Hot ADA issue we&#8217;ve often covered makes it into NYTimes mag [Rebecca Skloot] And Time mag tackles scandal of ADA-suit mass filing for $$, long familiar to our readers [Alison Stateman] Can you guess mechanism by which snow globes turned out to cause fire hazard? (Then check link.) [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/microblog-2008-01-04/">Microblog 2008-01-04</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>
<p>Must stores let in &#8220;social support&#8221; goats? Hot ADA issue we&#8217;ve <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/service-animals/">often covered</a> makes it into NYTimes mag [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/magazine/04Creatures-t.html">Rebecca Skloot</a>] And Time mag tackles scandal of ADA-suit mass filing for $$, long <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ada-filing-mills/">familiar</a> to our readers [<a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1866666,00.html">Alison Stateman</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Can you guess mechanism by which snow globes turned out to cause fire hazard? (Then check link.) [<a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/stories/2008/12/22/daily10.html">K.C. Business Journal</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p> &#8220;Do Not Track&#8221; legislation could torpedo online-advertising models [<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/do_not_track_legislation_could_change_ad_landscape_redux.php">ReadWriteWeb</a> h/t @lilyhill]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>What if plea-bargaining defendants could give D.A.s eBay-style feedback? [<a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2008/12/21/justice-ebay-style.aspx?ref=rss">Greenfield</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>UK cabinet minister wants govt to regulate Net with aim of child safety, Brit blogger says &#8211; hell, no! [<a href="http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2008/12/do_not_expect_u.html">Perry de Havilland, Samizdata</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>As lawyer-driven mummeries go, which is worse, coffee machine overwarning or medical &#8220;informed consent&#8221;? [<a href="http://thehappyhospitalist.blogspot.com/2008/12/american-health-care-in-nutshell.html">Happy Hospitalist</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Bogus memoirs nowadays spawn real lawsuits, as we remember from James Frey case [<a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2008/12/when-memoirs-are-fiction-lawsuits-are-a-fact.html">Elefant</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Is health care prohibition in our future? [<a href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2009/01/is-health-care-prohibitation-in-our.html">KevinMD</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Massachusetts child support guidelines said to be highly onerous for dads already and getting worse [<a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2009/01/02/insane-massachusetts-child-support-guidelines/">Bader, CEI</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Kid gloves from some local media for Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd &#038; his magic mortgages [<a href="http://christopherfountain.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/shhh-dont-say-a-word-its-chris-dodd/">Christopher Fountain</a> and <a href="http://christopherfountain.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/more-on-dodd/">again</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Had Robertson v. Princeton donor-intent suit gone to trial, lawyers might have billed $120 million hourly fees. How&#8217;d the number get that high? [<a href="http://www.litigationandtrial.com/2008/12/articles/litigation/news/120-million-in-hourly-billing-for-a-single-trial-what-happened-in-robertson-v-princeton/">Kennerly, Litigation &#038; Trial</a> and <a href="http://www.litigationandtrial.com/2008/12/articles/litigation/ideas/how-not-to-spend-120-million-in-hourly-fees-on-a-single-trial-a-few-questions-for-robertson-v-princeton/">again</a>]</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>A reminder: these microblog posts are based on a selection of my contributions to Twitter, which you can &#8220;follow&#8221; <a href="http://twitter.com/walterolson">here</a>.</p>
</li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/ada-filing-mills/" title="ADA filing mills" rel="tag">ADA filing mills</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/charitable-trusts/" title="charitable trusts" rel="tag">charitable trusts</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/child-support/" title="child support" rel="tag">child support</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/colleges-and-universities/" title="colleges and universities" rel="tag">colleges and universities</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/connecticut/" title="Connecticut" rel="tag">Connecticut</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/feeing-frenzy/" title="feeing frenzy" rel="tag">feeing frenzy</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/james-frey/" title="James Frey" rel="tag">James Frey</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/massachusetts/" title="Massachusetts" rel="tag">Massachusetts</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/privacy/" title="privacy" rel="tag">privacy</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/service-animals/" title="service animals" rel="tag">service animals</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/microblog-2008-01-04/">Microblog 2008-01-04</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/microblog-2008-01-04/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Million Little Plaintiffs</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/a-million-little-plaintiffs/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/a-million-little-plaintiffs/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nastygrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An acquaintance&#8212;whose self-accounts have appeared in several books, radio stories, prominent magazines and web publications&#8212;published a short story in a &#8220;non-fiction&#8221; anthology. I was familiar with the underlying events and asked her about it, since, even aside from unacknowledged name-changes, it plainly had invented and exaggerated elements, and a twisted chronology meant to fit a [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/a-million-little-plaintiffs/">A Million Little Plaintiffs</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An acquaintance&mdash;whose self-accounts have appeared in several books, radio stories, prominent magazines and web publications&mdash;published a short story in a &#8220;non-fiction&#8221; anthology.  I was familiar with the underlying events and asked her about it, since, even aside from unacknowledged name-changes, it plainly had invented and exaggerated elements, and a twisted chronology meant to fit a story arc.  &#8220;Of course it does.  It&#8217;s <i>creative</i> non-fiction,&#8221; she responded in exasperation, introducing me to a new definition of &#8220;non-fiction&#8221; that I hadn&#8217;t previously been aware of.</p>
<p>So <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0104061jamesfrey1.html">the James Frey scandal</a> (or a <a href="http://www.blacktable.com/kirtz050713.htm">smaller one involving the Times&#8217; Modern Love section</a>) doesn&#8217;t surprise me in the slightest; I&#8217;ve just come to assume that anything published under the memoir label in the twenty-first century is the modern-day equivalent of a Philip Roth novel that isn&#8217;t well-written enough to be successfully marketed as fiction.</p>
<p>The question is what will a court do when confronted with the inevitable free-riding class action, claiming that the publisher has committed consumer fraud, and demanding the right for every book owner to get a full refund and punitive damages (and, of course, a taste for the attorneys who took the entrepreneurial risk of typing up a summary of The Smoking Gun story and filing it in court), before settling for 50-cent coupons, a donation of remaindered books to a &#8220;Books for Addicts&#8221; program, and a multi-million-dollar attorney fee.  Will there be a ruling that &#8220;non-fiction&#8221; memoirs that aren&#8217;t require labelling?  If so, what are the First Amendment implications for other non-fiction books?  A ruling that doesn&#8217;t provide a clear swath of protection for publishers could essentially abolish memoirs or first-person reporting, because a ruling that establishes any sort of rule calling Frey&#8217;s book consumer fraud (or even just potentially actionable consumer fraud) could encourage other attempts to sue other successful memoir-publishers for less egregious exaggerations.  (This problem earlier arose with the Beardstown Ladies (<a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/archives/99nov2.html#991116b">Nov. 16, 1999</a>), and the California Court of Appeal was far from sympathetic to the First Amendment issues.)</p>
<p>Random House appears to be attempting to pre-empt litigation by <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/books/01/11/arts.frey.reut/index.html">offering refunds</a> to anyone who asks, which will surely be a smaller percentage of customers than a hired plaintiffs&#8217; damages expert would testify to.</p>
<p><a href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2006/01/several_big_lie.html">Prawfsblawg asks</a> about Frey&#8217;s liability to the publisher, which seems to miss the point: what&#8217;s the publisher&#8217;s theory of damages?  &#8220;You sold us a book that made us a lot of money&#8221;?</p>
<p>Also of interest to Overlawyered readers is the <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/jamesfrey/freysides/singerfrey1.html">bullying letter sent by Frey&#8217;s lawyer</a> to The Smoking Gun to try to keep them from publishing their findings.  We may have our own story of bullying letters to tell shortly.</p>
<p>(And welcome <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2006/01/12/in-re-a-million-little-pieces/">Wall Street Journal</a> and <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004273.htm">Malkin</a> readers; do check out our <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">main page</a> and <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/">sister site</a>.)</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/class-actions/" title="class actions" rel="tag">class actions</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/james-frey/" title="James Frey" rel="tag">James Frey</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nastygrams/" title="nastygrams" rel="tag">nastygrams</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/publishers/" title="publishers" rel="tag">publishers</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/a-million-little-plaintiffs/">A Million Little Plaintiffs</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/a-million-little-plaintiffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
