<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Coffee &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/john-coffee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Coughlin Stoia, AmLaw Daily and Prof. John Coffee, cont&#8217;d</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coughlin Stoia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witnesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Coffee]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, updating a Tuesday post, I expressed some annoyance that AmLaw Daily&#8217;s coverage of the $688 million Enron fee award extensively quoted Columbia lawprof Jack Coffee in support of the fee&#8217;s fairness &#8212; even casting him as a &#8220;frequent class action critic&#8221; whose praise for the fee was more credible because &#8220;unlikely&#8221; &#8212; without informing [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/">Coughlin Stoia, AmLaw Daily and Prof. John Coffee, cont&#8217;d</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, updating a Tuesday post, I <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/">expressed some annoyance</a> that AmLaw Daily&#8217;s coverage of the $688 million Enron fee award extensively quoted Columbia lawprof Jack Coffee in support of the fee&#8217;s fairness &#8212; even casting him as a &#8220;frequent class action critic&#8221; whose praise for the fee was more credible because &#8220;unlikely&#8221; &#8212; without informing readers that Prof. Coffee had in fact been hired by the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers to support their fee application, a role he has served in earlier cases as well. Now the publication has <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/09/coughlin-stoia.html">&#8220;updated [the post] with new information&#8221;</a> reflecting that relationship. Journalism professor Mark Obbie of Syracuse&#8217;s Carnegie Legal Reporting Program is kind enough to <a href="http://newhouse-web.syr.edu/legal/blog_comments.cfm?blogpost=738">credit my criticism with making a difference</a>. </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/coughlin-stoia/" title="Coughlin Stoia" rel="tag">Coughlin Stoia</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/expert-witnesses/" title="expert witnesses" rel="tag">expert witnesses</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/john-coffee/" title="John Coffee" rel="tag">John Coffee</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/">Coughlin Stoia, AmLaw Daily and Prof. John Coffee, cont&#8217;d</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enron: class action lawyers set to get $688 million</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Lerach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coughlin Stoia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feeing frenzy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Coffee]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman &#038; Robbins, formerly of Bill Lerach fame, and other law firms sued to pin the blame on banks, auditors, and other outside deep-pocket third parties, as well as on directors; defendants collectively paid $7.2 billion. Giving the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers $688 million of that is very &#8220;fair and reasonable&#8221; and involves no [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/">Enron: class action lawyers set to get $688 million</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman &#038; Robbins, formerly of Bill Lerach fame, and other law firms sued to pin the blame on banks, auditors, and other outside deep-pocket third parties, as well as on directors; defendants collectively paid $7.2 billion. Giving the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers $688 million of that is very &#8220;fair and reasonable&#8221; and involves no &#8220;windfall&#8221;, per U.S. District Judge Melinda Harmon. (Bloomberg, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aakdO2wIq9xU&#038;refer=worldwide">Sept. 8</a>). </p>
<p><strong>More</strong>: OK, so maybe Brian Baxter of AmLaw Daily is just pursuing a reasonable news angle when he <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/09/coughlin-stoia.html">quotes the Coughlin Stoia lawyers doing a little victory lap and waving to the crowd</a>. But if he&#8217;s going to quote Prof. John Coffee at such length as his big authority in support of the fee&#8217;s fairness, shouldn&#8217;t he go beyond identifying Coffee as &#8220;a professor at Columbia Law School and frequent class action critic&#8221; to spell out a little more explicitly that, you know, Coffee was <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/03/enron-lawyers-want-695-million-texas-objects/">hired by the plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers in this case to defend their fee request</a>? Doesn&#8217;t that make it less surprising that Patrick Coughlin &#8220;welcomes the positive feedback&#8221; from these supposedly &#8220;unlikely legal circles&#8221; to support his case? (<a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/1-billion-legal-fee-eyed-in-enron-suit/">more background</a>, <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/11/21/lerach-may-see-50-million-in-enron-fees/">yet more</a>). </p>
<p><strong>Update</strong> <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/coughlin-stoia-amlaw-daily-and-prof-john-coffee-contd/">Thurs. a.m.</a>: by yesterday evening American Lawyer had substantially &#8220;updated [the post] with new information&#8221; to reflect the Coffee relationship, and Prof. Obbie is kind enough to <a href="http://newhouse-web.syr.edu/legal/blog_comments.cfm?blogpost=738">give me some credit</a> for that happening. </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/bill-lerach/" title="Bill Lerach" rel="tag">Bill Lerach</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/coughlin-stoia/" title="Coughlin Stoia" rel="tag">Coughlin Stoia</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/enron/" title="Enron" rel="tag">Enron</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/feeing-frenzy/" title="feeing frenzy" rel="tag">feeing frenzy</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/john-coffee/" title="John Coffee" rel="tag">John Coffee</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/">Enron: class action lawyers set to get $688 million</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
