<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Judicial Watch &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/judicial-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;Judicial Watch: Barking at the Moon?&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/judicial-watch-barking-at-the-moon/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/judicial-watch-barking-at-the-moon/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Klayman]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Libit at Politico (Dec. 17) quotes me in a new piece on Judicial Watch, the more-or-less-conservative activist group that brought disrepute on itself in the Clinton years by advancing litigation (often of highly dubious merit) as a scorched-earth method of politics-by-other-means. Since the departure of eccentric founder Larry Klayman the group has been edging [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/judicial-watch-barking-at-the-moon/">&#8220;Judicial Watch: Barking at the Moon?&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Libit at Politico (<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16680.html">Dec. 17</a>) quotes me in a new piece on Judicial Watch, the more-or-less-conservative activist group that brought disrepute on itself in the Clinton years by advancing litigation (often of highly dubious merit) as a scorched-earth method of politics-by-other-means. Since the departure of eccentric founder Larry Klayman the group has been edging back toward respectability, but the return of Hillary Clinton to the Executive Branch seems to have rekindled a &#8220;Pavlovian&#8221; impulse to sue first and think later. </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/hillary-clinton/" title="Hillary Clinton" rel="tag">Hillary Clinton</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/judicial-watch/" title="Judicial Watch" rel="tag">Judicial Watch</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/larry-klayman/" title="Larry Klayman" rel="tag">Larry Klayman</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/judicial-watch-barking-at-the-moon/">&#8220;Judicial Watch: Barking at the Moon?&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/judicial-watch-barking-at-the-moon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
