<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marc Rodwin &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/marc-rodwin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:28:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Health Affairs letter on Marc Rodwin Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Study</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/health-affairs-letter-on-marc-rodwin-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-study/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Rodwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical malpractice insurance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>You may remember Professor Rodwin and I debating his paper on Point of Law; that debate has spilled over onto the pages of the November/December issue of Health Affairs, which published a short letter from me criticizing the Rodwin study and a muddying response from the authors: Marc Rodwin and colleagues’ highly publicized conclusion that [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/health-affairs-letter-on-marc-rodwin-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-study/">Health Affairs letter on Marc Rodwin Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Study</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may remember Professor Rodwin and I <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/marc-rodwin-and-the-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-crisis/">debating his paper on Point of Law</a>; that debate has spilled over onto the pages of the November/December issue of <em>Health Affairs</em>, which published <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/27/6/1745-a">a short letter from me criticizing the Rodwin study</a> and a <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/27/6/1746">muddying response from the authors</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Marc Rodwin and colleagues’ highly publicized conclusion<sup> </sup>that Massachusetts does not have a malpractice insurance crisis<sup> </sup>(May/Jun 08) is not supported by the data in their paper.<sup> </sup></p>
<p>First, the sole finding supporting the conclusion, that malpractice<sup> </sup>insurance rates declined 1 percent from 1990 to 2005, is an<sup> </sup>artifact of the Simpson Paradox. Rates for low-risk doctors<sup> </sup>increased 14 percent; rates for high-risk doctors increased<sup> </sup>45 percent. The mean decreased entirely because the mix of doctors<sup> </sup>changed, and the percentage of insured doctors with expensive<sup> </sup>high-risk policies declined substantially&#8230;</p></blockquote>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/marc-rodwin/" title="Marc Rodwin" rel="tag">Marc Rodwin</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/massachusetts/" title="Massachusetts" rel="tag">Massachusetts</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/medical-malpractice-insurance/" title="medical malpractice insurance" rel="tag">medical malpractice insurance</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/health-affairs-letter-on-marc-rodwin-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-study/">Health Affairs letter on Marc Rodwin Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Study</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marc Rodwin and the Massachusetts medical malpractice crisis</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/marc-rodwin-and-the-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-crisis/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/marc-rodwin-and-the-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-crisis/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Marc Rodwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical malpractice insurance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Health Affairs paper by Suffolk University Law Professor Marc Rodwin et al. has been generating a lot of press and blog attention for its claim that there is no medical malpractice crisis in Massachusetts.  He and I have been debating the paper at Point of Law (Frank; Rodwin; Frank); as I show, that conclusion [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/marc-rodwin-and-the-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-crisis/">Marc Rodwin and the Massachusetts medical malpractice crisis</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/27/3/835?etoc"><em>Health Affairs </em>paper</a> by Suffolk University Law Professor Marc Rodwin <em>et al. </em>has been generating a lot of press and blog attention for its claim that there is no medical malpractice crisis in Massachusetts.  He and I have been debating the paper at Point of Law (<a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/massachusetts-med-mal-prof-mar.php">Frank</a>; <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/massachusetts-med-mal-prof-mar.php">Rodwin</a>; <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/a-response-to-marc-rodwin-the.php">Frank</a>); as I show, that conclusion is highly suspect and seems divorced from the underlying data.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/marc-rodwin/" title="Marc Rodwin" rel="tag">Marc Rodwin</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/massachusetts/" title="Massachusetts" rel="tag">Massachusetts</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/medical/" title="medical" rel="tag">medical</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/medical-malpractice-insurance/" title="medical malpractice insurance" rel="tag">medical malpractice insurance</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/marc-rodwin-and-the-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-crisis/">Marc Rodwin and the Massachusetts medical malpractice crisis</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/marc-rodwin-and-the-massachusetts-medical-malpractice-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 19 roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/may-19-roundup/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/may-19-roundup/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Alien Tort Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys' fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead paint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madison County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Rodwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milberg Weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roundups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vioxx]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7008</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>No imprisonment for debt, except when owed to a lawyer? Texas man who didn&#8217;t pay $1,750 attorney fee jailed for 30 days [ABA Journal; Jonathan Skero] Exploding-bra claim against Victoria&#8217;s Secret &#8220;does not specify how the injury occurred&#8221; [Greenville, S.C. News] We&#8217;re all set to close on your mortgage refinance, and while we&#8217;re at it [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/may-19-roundup/">May 19 roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>No imprisonment for debt, except when owed to a lawyer? Texas man who didn&#8217;t pay $1,750 attorney fee jailed for 30 days [<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/texas_man_gets_30_days_for_not_paying_legal_bill">ABA Journal</a>; Jonathan Skero]</li>
<li>Exploding-bra claim against Victoria&#8217;s Secret &#8220;does not specify how the injury occurred&#8221; [<a href="http://www.greenvilleonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/200804030200/NEWS01/804030305">Greenville, S.C. News</a>]</li>
<li>We&#8217;re all set to close on your mortgage refinance, and while we&#8217;re at it could I interest you in a class action over courier fees? [<a href="http://www.madisonrecord.com/arguments/209591-this-is-consumer-protection">Madison County Record</a>]</li>
<li>So long we elect state court judges, they&#8217;ll never escape taint associated with need to campaign [<a href="http://www.whataboutclients.com/archives/2008/04/the_elected_jud_1.html">J.D. Hull, What About Clients?</a>]</li>
<li>Milberg now argues any forfeiture of proceeds from tainted cases should be confined to its actual net profits, not gross fee revenue &#8212; would it have let off defendants it sued so easily? [<a href="http://nysun.com/news/business/milberg-llp-asks-judge-limit-payout">Gerstein, NY Sun</a>]</li>
<li>Tom Goldstein of Akin Gump (<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/">SCOTUSblog</a>) has a spoof &#8220;Call 1-CER-TIORARI&#8221; TV ad hawking his Supreme Court advocacy [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT2yZ2ZFDeU">YouTube</a>]</li>
<li>New at Point of Law: Colorado unions&#8217; <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/colorados-other-revengeinitiat.php">revenge initiatives</a>; Dennis Quaid at Congressional <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/federal-preemption-the-hearing.php">hearing on federal pre-emption</a>; guess why <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/train-in-pain.php">Orlando</a> isn&#8217;t getting <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/train-in-vain.php">commuter rail</a>; drafting docs <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/drafting-doctors-for-er-duty.php">for ER duty</a>; court green-lights suit blaming U.S. business <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/perforce-court-allows-alien-to.php">for South African apartheid</a>; what we can learn from <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/defunct-causes-of-action-contd.php">defunct causes of action</a>; Rhode Island high court <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/rhode-island-lead-paint-hearin.php">mulls</a> lead <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/coverage-of-the-ri-supreme-cou.php">paint suit</a>; and Ted on <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/marc-a-rodwin-et-al-malpractic.php">Massachusetts med-mal study</a> and on reversal of <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/05/breaking-merck-wins-reversal-o.php">$32 million Garza v. Merck Vioxx verdict</a>.</li>
<li>Managers at Tim Horton may have been ninnies to fire worker who quieted crying child by giving out free mini-donut, but today&#8217;s law does tend to ninnyize those in authority [<a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/05/08/colby-cosh-on-tim-hortons-embarrassing-timbitgate-a-timbit-sized-sign-of-our-times.aspx">Cosh/National Post</a>, Canada]</li>
<li>Jonathan Rauch isn&#8217;t overjoyed at California high court marriage ruling [<a href="http://www.indegayforum.org/blog/show/31523.html">Independent Gay Forum</a>; more from <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/convictions/archive/tags/california+gay+marriage/default.aspx">Kmiec, Lederman and others at Slate</a> and from <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1210871784.shtml">Eugene Volokh</a>] <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/unwise_haste_on_gay_marriage.html">Steve Chapman</a> via <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/05/haste-on-marria.html">Sullivan</a> and <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1211244391.shtml">Dale Carpenter @ Volokh</a>.</li>
<li>Road delayed at £1million expense, and then great crested newt turned out not to be there [Leicester, U.K.; <a href="http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_2856572.html?menu=">Ananova</a>]</li>
<li>Why trial lawyers were pleased when Boeing moved its HQ from Seattle to Chicago [<a href="http://overlawyered.com/index.php/early-years/may-2001-archives-part-2/#0517a">seven years ago on Overlawyered</a>]</li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/alien-tort-claims-act/" title="Alien Tort Claims Act" rel="tag">Alien Tort Claims Act</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/attorneys-fees/" title="attorneys&#039; fees" rel="tag">attorneys&#039; fees</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/colorado/" title="Colorado" rel="tag">Colorado</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/forum-shopping/" title="forum shopping" rel="tag">forum shopping</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/lead-paint/" title="lead paint" rel="tag">lead paint</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/madison-county/" title="Madison County" rel="tag">Madison County</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/marc-rodwin/" title="Marc Rodwin" rel="tag">Marc Rodwin</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/massachusetts/" title="Massachusetts" rel="tag">Massachusetts</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/milberg-weiss/" title="Milberg Weiss" rel="tag">Milberg Weiss</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/rhode-island/" title="Rhode Island" rel="tag">Rhode Island</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/roundups/" title="roundups" rel="tag">roundups</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/seattle/" title="Seattle" rel="tag">Seattle</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/south-africa/" title="South Africa" rel="tag">South Africa</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/vioxx/" title="Vioxx" rel="tag">Vioxx</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/may-19-roundup/">May 19 roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/may-19-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
