<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nancy Pelosi &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nancy-pelosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Buried on page 1431: Potemkin tort reform</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/10/buried-on-page-1431-potemkin-tort-reform/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/10/buried-on-page-1431-potemkin-tort-reform/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noneconomic damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial lawyer earmarks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=14485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Commentary&#8217;s Jennifer Rubin notices: A friend points out a little nugget of absurdity and political mendacity in the Pelosi health-care bill. Remember Obama’s effort to try a “test” for tort reform? (We don’t actually need a test, since it has worked to lower medical malpractice coverage and help increase access to doctors in states that [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/10/buried-on-page-1431-potemkin-tort-reform/">Buried on page 1431: Potemkin tort reform</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commentary&#8217;s <a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242">Jennifer Rubin notices</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A friend points out a little nugget of absurdity and political mendacity in the Pelosi health-care bill. Remember Obama’s effort to try a “test” for tort reform? (We don’t actually need a test, since it has worked to lower medical malpractice coverage and help increase access to doctors in states that have tried it.) Well, Pelosi’s bill has an anti-tort-reform measure. On pages <a href="http://documents.nytimes.com/the-house-s-health-care-bill/page/1431#p=1431">1431-1433</a> of the 1990-page spellbinder, there is a financial incentive for states to try “alternative medical liability laws.” But look — you don’t get the incentive if you have a law that would “limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.”</p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, Congress is providing a financial incentive to <i>uncap</i> damages.  Marvelous.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/medical/" title="medical" rel="tag">medical</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nancy-pelosi/" title="Nancy Pelosi" rel="tag">Nancy Pelosi</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/noneconomic-damages/" title="noneconomic damages" rel="tag">noneconomic damages</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/politics/" title="politics" rel="tag">politics</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/tort-reform/" title="tort reform" rel="tag">tort reform</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/trial-lawyer-earmarks/" title="trial lawyer earmarks" rel="tag">trial lawyer earmarks</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/10/buried-on-page-1431-potemkin-tort-reform/">Buried on page 1431: Potemkin tort reform</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/10/buried-on-page-1431-potemkin-tort-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>$1.6 billion tax break for plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/1-6-billion-tax-break-for-plaintiffs-lawyers/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/1-6-billion-tax-break-for-plaintiffs-lawyers/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the U.S. Chamber-backed Legal NewsLine, the litigation lobby is quietly preparing to push through a $1.6 billion (with a &#8220;b&#8221;) tax break that would let contingent-fee lawyers deduct expenses as made, rather than in the year of settling a suit. American Association for Justice lobbyist Linda Lipsen says Sens. Harry Reid and Max [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/1-6-billion-tax-break-for-plaintiffs-lawyers/">$1.6 billion tax break for plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.legalnewsline.com/spotlight/222204-lobbyist-aaj-looking-to-quietly-pass-plaintiff-lawyer-tax-break">According to the U.S. Chamber-backed Legal NewsLine</a>, the litigation lobby is quietly preparing to push through a $1.6 billion (with a &#8220;b&#8221;) tax break that would let contingent-fee lawyers deduct expenses as made, rather than in the year of settling a suit. American Association for Justice lobbyist Linda Lipsen says Sens. <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2004/12/supported-by-a-reid/">Harry Reid</a> and Max Baucus and Reps. <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/07/the-aajs-misguided-media-ban/">Nancy Pelosi</a> and Charles Rangel are among those on board, as well as &#8220;some Republicans&#8221;, but &#8220;the problem is there is not a tax vehicle yet,&#8221; &#8212; &#8220;You cannot have a stand alone bill to help lawyers &#8230; so we have to tuck it into something.&#8221; [cross-posted, and slightly adapted, from <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2009/07/aaj-looking-to.php">Point of Law</a>; updates and additional links there]</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/aaj/" title="AAJ" rel="tag">AAJ</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/charles-rangel/" title="Charles Rangel" rel="tag">Charles Rangel</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/harry-reid/" title="Harry Reid" rel="tag">Harry Reid</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/litigation-lobby/" title="litigation lobby" rel="tag">litigation lobby</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nancy-pelosi/" title="Nancy Pelosi" rel="tag">Nancy Pelosi</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/taxes/" title="taxes" rel="tag">taxes</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/1-6-billion-tax-break-for-plaintiffs-lawyers/">$1.6 billion tax break for plaintiff&#8217;s lawyers</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/1-6-billion-tax-break-for-plaintiffs-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The AAJ&#8217;s misguided media ban&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/the-aajs-misguided-media-ban/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/the-aajs-misguided-media-ban/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Waxman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Robert Ambrogi at Legal Blog Watch criticizes the trial lawyers&#8217; association for excluding the press from its annual convention, but the tactic seems to have worked pretty well in lowering the group&#8217;s lobbying profile and deflecting serious coverage of the parade of politicians, from Nancy Pelosi to Henry Waxman to DNC chair and Virginia governor [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/the-aajs-misguided-media-ban/">&#8220;The AAJ&#8217;s misguided media ban&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Ambrogi at Legal Blog Watch <a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2009/07/the-aajs-misguided-media-ban.html">criticizes the trial lawyers&#8217; association</a> for excluding the press from its annual convention, but the tactic seems to have worked pretty well in <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/07/27/trial-lawyer-conventions-have-admitted-media-in-the-past/">lowering</a> <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/07/29/health-care-lobbying-and-contributions-try-a-new-angle/">the group&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/07/30/somethings-missing-in-the-health-care-debate/">lobbying profile</a> and deflecting serious coverage of the parade of politicians, from <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/07/nancy-pelosi-to-address-trial-lawyers-convention/">Nancy Pelosi</a> to Henry Waxman to <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/07/27/at-the-lawyers-convention/">DNC chair and Virginia governor Tim Kaine</a>, who have made the pilgrimage as speakers to pay their respects. <strong>More</strong>: AAJ&#8217;s <a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2009/07/the-aaj-explains-its-media-ban.html">response</a>.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/aaj/" title="AAJ" rel="tag">AAJ</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/henry-waxman/" title="Henry Waxman" rel="tag">Henry Waxman</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/litigation-lobby/" title="litigation lobby" rel="tag">litigation lobby</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nancy-pelosi/" title="Nancy Pelosi" rel="tag">Nancy Pelosi</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/the-aajs-misguided-media-ban/">&#8220;The AAJ&#8217;s misguided media ban&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/the-aajs-misguided-media-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy Pelosi to address trial lawyers convention</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/nancy-pelosi-to-address-trial-lawyers-convention/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/nancy-pelosi-to-address-trial-lawyers-convention/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;ll be opening the AAJ annual convention tonight in San Francisco. Charles Krauthammer thinks the coziness between Big Law and certain parts of the political establishment may explain a lot about the faltering status of health care reform. More: &#8220;Media Barred from Speaker Pelosi’s Speech to Trial Lawyers&#8220;. And John Steele Gordon at Commentary &#8220;Contentions&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/nancy-pelosi-to-address-trial-lawyers-convention/">Nancy Pelosi to address trial lawyers convention</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;ll be <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/07/24/health-care-speaker-pelosi-trial-lawyers-in-san-francisco/">opening the AAJ annual convention</a> tonight in San Francisco.  Charles Krauthammer thinks the coziness between Big Law and certain parts of the political establishment <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/23/AR2009072302723.html">may explain a lot</a> about the faltering status of health care reform. </p>
<p><strong>More</strong>: &#8220;<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2009/07/26/media-barred-from-speaker-pelosis-speech-to-trial-lawyers/">Media Barred from Speaker Pelosi’s Speech to Trial Lawyers</a>&#8220;. And John Steele Gordon at Commentary &#8220;Contentions&#8221; offers some <a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/gordon/74392">ideas for health care reform</a> that were probably not included in Pelosi&#8217;s speech.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/aaj/" title="AAJ" rel="tag">AAJ</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/medical/" title="medical" rel="tag">medical</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nancy-pelosi/" title="Nancy Pelosi" rel="tag">Nancy Pelosi</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/nancy-pelosi-to-address-trial-lawyers-convention/">Nancy Pelosi to address trial lawyers convention</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/nancy-pelosi-to-address-trial-lawyers-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Pelosi betrays her own House for a slew of trial lawyers&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/pelosi-betrays-her-own-house-for-a-slew-of-trial-lawyers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CPSC Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trial lawyer earmarks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve previously covered the Senate&#8217;s boon to trial lawyers at the expense of consumers and shareholders, the Consumer Product Safety Commission Act, S. 2663: Feb. 20; Feb. 25; Mar. 5. (The bill was amended somewhat since we complained but Democrats, on a party line vote, tabled critical amendments to prohibit the use of contingent-fee attorneys [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/pelosi-betrays-her-own-house-for-a-slew-of-trial-lawyers/">&#8220;Pelosi betrays her own House for a slew of trial lawyers&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve previously covered the Senate&#8217;s boon to trial lawyers at the expense of consumers and shareholders, the Consumer Product Safety Commission Act, S. 2663: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/congresss_latest_gift_to_lawye.html">Feb. 20</a>; <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/whistle_while_you_work.html">Feb. 25</a>; <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/senate-cpsc-bill-a-boon-for-tr.html">Mar. 5</a>.  (The <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S.2663:">bill was amended somewhat</a> since we complained but Democrats, on a party line vote, tabled <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00039">critical amendments</a> to prohibit the use of contingent-fee attorneys and <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00040">permit prevailing parties to recover attorneys&#8217; fees</a>.)  The House passed a somewhat more sensible version of the bill unanimously, but Pelosi, for some reason, is trying to bypass her chamber&#8217;s proponents in constructing the &#8220;conference committee&#8221; that will work out the differences between the bills in favor of those of trial lawyers.  <a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-1357163~Pelosi_betrays_her_own_House_for_a_slew_of_trial_lawyers.html">Today&#8217;s Washington Examiner has the unholy details</a>.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/cpsc-act/" title="CPSC Act" rel="tag">CPSC Act</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/litigation-lobby/" title="litigation lobby" rel="tag">litigation lobby</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nancy-pelosi/" title="Nancy Pelosi" rel="tag">Nancy Pelosi</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/politics/" title="politics" rel="tag">politics</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/trial-lawyer-earmarks/" title="trial lawyer earmarks" rel="tag">trial lawyer earmarks</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/pelosi-betrays-her-own-house-for-a-slew-of-trial-lawyers/">&#8220;Pelosi betrays her own House for a slew of trial lawyers&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
