pregnancy discrimination – Overlawyered

Discrimination law roundup

Walter Olson — Fri, 06 Mar 2020 11:02:43 +0000

More boxes get banned: Connecticut measure will ban asking age on job applications [Daniel Schwartz]
In closely divided en banc ruling, Ninth Circuit rules it cruel and unusual punishment for prison authorities to deny inmate sex-reassignment surgery [en banc opinion and panel decision; Josh Blackman on a dissent authored by Judge Patrick Bumatay; I was quoted last year in public radio coverage of the Adree Edmo case]
“Fear And Loathing At The Department Of Labor: Has The OFCCP Become A Law Unto Itself?” [Cory Andrews, WLF, more]
“Look for the Union Label, not the Gender Role” [Sarah Skwire]
Freedom means freedom for everyone: joined by Prof. Eugene Volokh, Cato files First Amendment amicus brief on behalf of Colorado graphic/web designer who objects to working on same-sex weddings [Ilya Shapiro and James Knight on 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, Tenth Circuit]
CBS News misrepresents the state of pregnancy-accommodation law in the workplace [Jon Hyman]

Tags: age discrimination, government contract compliance, labor unions, pregnancy discrimination, prisoners, sex discrimination, transgender

Discrimination law roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

No lockable private room for breast-feeding at workplace: $3.8 million award

Walter Olson — Fri, 05 Jul 2019 10:05:46 +0000

“Federal law requires that you provide breastfeeding moms a room with a locking door–that is not a bathroom–to pump breast milk up until the baby’s first birthday. This is pretty easy in a big office building with lots of space, but not so easy in a firehouse. The law, however, doesn’t make an exception for difficulty, as the [City of Tucson fire department] found out — to the tune of $3.8 million.” [Suzanne Lucas, Inc.]

Tags: discrimination law, pregnancy discrimination

No lockable private room for breast-feeding at workplace: $3.8 million award is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Discrimination law roundup

Walter Olson — Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:58:44 +0000

Can a law ban calls to police by the public that are based on stereotyping or bias? Grand Rapids may find out [Scott Greenfield]
Courts and EEOC have held that the federal ban on pregnancy discrimination encompasses a ban on discrimination related to abortion [Jon Hyman] Legislative proposal in Ohio, fortunately given little chance of passage, would make anti-vaxxers a protected group under state employment discrimination law [same]
“Finally Some Robust Research Into Whether ‘Diversity Training’ Actually Works – Unfortunately It’s Not Very Promising” [Jesse Singal, British Psychological Society Research Digest, earlier]
New EEOC employer reporting requirements represent “an order of magnitude increase in the amount of information the government wants” for one recreation management business [Coyote] How are federal agencies doing on civil rights issues in this administration? Federalist Society panel with Gail Heriot, Kenneth Marcus, Theodore Shaw, Timothy Taylor, moderated by Erik Jaffe;
When an outcry arose over its partnership decisions, “Paul, Weiss did what every other mainstream institution does today when accused of racial bias: it fell on its sword.” [Heather Mac Donald, City Journal via Eugene Volokh]
“Targeted Advertising and Age Discrimination: An Explainer” [Joe Ruckert, On Labor]

Tags: advertising, age discrimination, discrimination law, EEOC, Facebook, police, pregnancy discrimination, vaccines

Discrimination law roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

July 11 roundup

Walter Olson — Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:01:40 +0000

“Expensive new licensing requirements and the bureaucratic headache of implementing” new regulations are expected to reduce further the number of agencies offering international adoption to U.S. families [Liz Wolfe, Reason] And don’t forget to mark your calendar and, if you can attend in person, register for next week’s July 19 Cato conference on adoption policy, at which international adoption will be one focus;
Report confirms again what I wrote nearly a year ago: many persons are being held in jail longer under Maryland’s ill-thought-out venture in restricting cash bail [Lynh Bui, Washington Post, my WSJ piece last September, more]
Online data protection episode is just latest instance of how California initiative process can put disturbing leverage in private hands [Cathy Gellis, TechDirt]
“The cans now read ‘NON-TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT ALMA MATER IPA’ with no other Pitt-related images.” [Grant Burgman, Pitt News on campus beer trademark controversy]
“Pregnancy discrimination? Don’t rely on government for additional protection” [Vanessa Brown Calder, Cato]
If you’re looking to dodge voir dire scrutiny: “How To Get On a Jury” [Mark Bennett, Reason]

Tags: adoption, bail bonds, beer and brewers, California, jury nullification, jury selection, Maryland, pregnancy discrimination

July 11 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

My take on Young v. United Parcel Service

Walter Olson — Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:47:20 +0000

Supreme Court liberals smack around the Obama Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), even as they hand a win to a pregnancy-bias plaintiff. I’ve got a write-up at Cato at Liberty. More: Josh Blackman.

Tags: EEOC, pregnancy discrimination, Supreme Court, WO writings

My take on Young v. United Parcel Service is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Labor and employment roundup

Walter Olson — Wed, 04 Feb 2015 05:05:39 +0000

Jury convicts Ironworkers Local 401 boss in union violence case [Philadelphia Inquirer, CBS Philly, earlier here, etc. on Quaker meetinghouse arson and other crimes] Pennsylvania lawmaker proposes to end unions’ exemption from laws defining crimes of harassment, stalking, threatening [York Dispatch; more on exemption of unions from these laws]
Emergent regime under federal law: if you’ve ever offered light duty to a disabled worker or returning injured worker, you’d better offer it to pregnant worker too [Jon Hyman]
Everything you know about company towns is wrong [Alex Tabarrok]
“The EEOC issues you’ll want to keep an eye on in 2015” [Littler Mendelson via Tim Gould, HR Morning]
Sued if you do: employers struggle to navigate between government rules encouraging, penalizing hiring of applicants with criminal records [WSJ, paywall] “Watch Your Back: The Growing Threat of FCRA Background Check Class Actions” [Gregory Snell, Foley & Lardner]
“Nearly 30 Percent of Workers in the U.S. Need a License to Perform Their Job: It Is Time to Examine Occupational Licensing Practices” [Melissa S. Kearney, Brad Hershbein and David Boddy, Brookings via John Cochrane]
“The Effect of Mandatory Sick Leave Policies: Reviewing the Evidence” [Max Nelsen] “Popularity of Obama’s paid sick leave proposal depends on workers not realizing it ultimately comes out of their paychecks.” [James Sherk]

Tags: criminal records and hiring, EEOC, labor unions, occupational licensure, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pregnancy discrimination, workplace

Labor and employment roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Expand pregnancy-bias law to include accommodation rights?

Walter Olson — Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:39:58 +0000

Young v. United Parcel Service, in the Supreme Court, which has been built up as a cause celebre, turns on whether the courts should feel free to re-interpret a 1978 federal law, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, so as to include evolving ideas of a right to accommodation akin to the ADA. The alternative position is that if such a right to accommodation is now thought to be a good idea, advocates should get Congress to enact it into law explicitly. [Lyle Denniston and related SCOTUSBlog, USA Today, Bloomberg/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette with auto-play, The Economist]

Tags: disabled rights, pregnancy discrimination, Supreme Court

Expand pregnancy-bias law to include accommodation rights? is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Pick a number, any number: $185 million for pregnancy bias

Walter Olson — Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:46:29 +0000

California: “A jury has awarded a local mother more than $185 million in damages in a pregnancy and gender discrimination case against her former employer AutoZone.” [KGTV, auto-plays]

More: Jon Hyman (damage to company’s reputation likely more serious than eventual actual payout).

Tags: jackpot justice, pregnancy discrimination, retaliation, San Diego, workplace

Pick a number, any number: $185 million for pregnancy bias is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Three more courtroom defeats for EEOC

Walter Olson — Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:23:58 +0000

The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is used to getting its way since most employers would rather settle rather than face the expense and publicity risk of litigating against it. But sometimes, as I note in my new post at Cato, judges get a close look at just how weak the commission’s position is. And then…

More from Bob in comments: “Here’s the problem… major employers have made changes to their severance agreements to comport with the EEOC’s position in CVS. They EEOC has lost the case and still gotten the change they wanted. That’s all they care about. Much like the new Pregnancy Discrimination Act guidance which turns prior guidance and case law on its head. Major employers have already reacted in order to avoid costly litigation though the chances of a neutral court agreeing with the guidance are pretty low.”

Tags: EEOC, pregnancy discrimination

Three more courtroom defeats for EEOC is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

EEOC roundup

Walter Olson — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:34:35 +0000

“U.S. Chamber of Commerce challenges EEOC over its ‘unreasonable’ enforcement tactics” [Jon Hyman, more on House oversight hearing, earlier on court rebuffs to agency and more]
On summary judgment: “EEOC case alleging ADA violations against Womble Carlyle nixed by federal judge” [ABA Journal]
By 3-2 commissioner vote, EEOC adopts detailed, restrictive new guidance on pregnancy discrimination [Eric Meyer, Hyman]
Commission thinks its investigation, mediation and other pre-litigation procedures should be immune from court oversight and public transparency [Merrily Archer]
Survey: “Are Employers Adapting to EEOC Guidance on Employment Background Checks?” [Nick Fishman, Employee Screen, related earlier]
Commission sues Wisconsin Plastics, Inc. for terminating employees with low-rated English skills as part of English on the job policy [Scott Greenfield, EEOC, my two cents way back]
“Is the EEOC the new NLRB?” [John Holmquist, Michigan Employment Law Connection]

Tags: criminal records and hiring, EEOC, language bias, pregnancy discrimination

EEOC roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system