<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Second Circuit &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 21:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Our inside tips vs. your inside tips</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/01/our-inside-tips-vs-your-inside-tips/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/01/our-inside-tips-vs-your-inside-tips/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2019 17:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosecutorial abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities litigation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=72906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Concurring in a Second Circuit opinion declining to overturn an insider trading conviction in the case of U.S. v. Walters, Judge Dennis Jacobs points out &#8220;egregious&#8221; FBI leaks and &#8220;notices the irony that Walters and the FBI agent both apparently misused confidential information, but that only one of them is going to jail.&#8221; [Ira Stoll, [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/01/our-inside-tips-vs-your-inside-tips/">Our inside tips vs. your inside tips</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concurring in a <a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/d93f8304-1557-4f59-920c-9ce3823e3cb7/25/doc/17-2373_complete_opn.pdf">Second Circuit opinion</a> declining to overturn an insider trading conviction in the case of U.S. v. Walters, Judge Dennis Jacobs points out &#8220;egregious&#8221; FBI leaks and  &#8220;notices the irony that Walters and the FBI agent both apparently misused confidential information, but that only one of them is going to jail.&#8221; [<a href="https://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2019/01/judge-jacobs-on-egregious-fbi-leaks">Ira Stoll, Future of Capitalism</a>]  </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/prosecutorial-abuse/" title="prosecutorial abuse" rel="tag">prosecutorial abuse</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/securities-litigation/" title="securities litigation" rel="tag">securities litigation</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/01/our-inside-tips-vs-your-inside-tips/">Our inside tips vs. your inside tips</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/01/our-inside-tips-vs-your-inside-tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Circuit: Schneiderman can unmask private group&#8217;s donors</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/second-circuit-schneiderman-can-unmask-private-groups-donors/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/second-circuit-schneiderman-can-unmask-private-groups-donors/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 05:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schneiderman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=69065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At least since 1958&#8217;s NAACP v. Alabama, it has been thought settled that state demands for the disclosure of private organizations&#8217; membership and donor lists poses very real risks of First Amendment infringement to which courts must be sensitive. Recent years, however, have seen concerted efforts to strip anonymity from donors to at least some [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/second-circuit-schneiderman-can-unmask-private-groups-donors/">Second Circuit: Schneiderman can unmask private group&#8217;s donors</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least since 1958&#8217;s NAACP v. Alabama, it has been thought settled that state demands for the disclosure of private organizations&#8217; membership and donor lists poses very real risks of First Amendment infringement to which courts must be sensitive. Recent years, however, have seen concerted efforts to strip anonymity from donors to at least some non-profit groups with a policy emphasis. One danger &#8212; or feature, from the standpoint of some groups doing the campaigning &#8212; is that if target groups can be made to divulge such information, their supporters can be exposed to pressure, shaming, and public and private retaliation. </p>
<p>Kamala Harris, then Attorney General of California and now Senator from that state, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/04/federal-court-nixes-kamala-harris-grab-donor-lists/">did not fare well in court</a> in such a campaign while in state office, but New York&#8217;s left-leaning Attorney General Eric Schneiderman seems to be enjoying better luck in a similar push. A Second Circuit panel has ruled in favor of his demands for the donor lists of Citizens United, the conservative group whose role in a <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/?s=%22citizens+united%22">landmark First Amendment case</a> at the Supreme Court has made it, along with that case, &#8220;the Emmanuel Goldstein of the American left.&#8221; It will not be surprising if the Supreme Court is soon asked to reaffirm the protections of NAACP v. Alabama. [<a href="https://www.cato.org/blog/new-york-attorney-general-schneiderman-goes-after-citizens-uniteds-donors">Trevor Burrus and Reilly Stephens, Cato</a>, and thanks for mention; see also my <a href="https://www.cato.org/blog/federal-judge-california-ag-cant-demand-nonprofits-donor-lists">April 2016 Cato piece</a>]  </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/campaign-regulation/" title="campaign regulation" rel="tag">campaign regulation</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/eric-schneiderman/" title="Eric Schneiderman" rel="tag">Eric Schneiderman</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/first-amendment/" title="First Amendment" rel="tag">First Amendment</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/second-circuit-schneiderman-can-unmask-private-groups-donors/">Second Circuit: Schneiderman can unmask private group&#8217;s donors</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/second-circuit-schneiderman-can-unmask-private-groups-donors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right to curse out one&#8217;s boss on Facebook</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/07/right-curse-ones-boss-facebook/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/07/right-curse-ones-boss-facebook/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 04:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Labor Relations Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=65053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s been two years since the NLRB determined that section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act protected an employee’s profanity laced Facebook rant simply because he ended it with a pro union message. I held out hope that the court of appeals would see the folly in the decision and send a clear message [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/07/right-curse-ones-boss-facebook/">Right to curse out one&#8217;s boss on Facebook</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s been two years since the NLRB determined that section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act protected an employee’s profanity laced Facebook rant simply because he ended it with a pro union message. I held out hope that the court of appeals would see the folly in the decision and send a clear message to employees and employers that such misconduct remains a terminable offense. <a href="http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/15-1841/15-1841-2017-04-21.html">NLRB v. Pier Sixty</a> (2nd Cir. 4/21/17) dashed that hope.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/2017/04/2nd-circuit-holds-that-its-perfectly.html">Jon Hyman</a>] More: <a href="https://www.nixonpeabody.com/en/ideas/articles/2017/04/28/second-circuit-upholds-nlrb-finding-employee-facebook-rant-protected-under-nlra">Nixon Peabody</a>, <a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2017/04/you-cant-be-fired-for-a-facebook-post-calling-your-boss-a-loser-nlrb-v-pier-sixty.htm">Eric Goldman</a>.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/facebook/" title="Facebook" rel="tag">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/national-labor-relations-board/" title="National Labor Relations Board" rel="tag">National Labor Relations Board</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/workplace/" title="workplace" rel="tag">workplace</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/07/right-curse-ones-boss-facebook/">Right to curse out one&#8217;s boss on Facebook</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/07/right-curse-ones-boss-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schools roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/schools-roundup-10/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colleges and universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability & schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42664</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Organizers of college conference on &#8220;intersection of health, humanities and disabilities&#8221; forget to make it accessible [Inside Higher Ed] Law forbade disclosure re: sex offender classmate, now Seattle schools are paying assault victim $700,000 [KIRO] Update: Lehigh U. student who sued over C+ grade won&#8217;t get a new trial, judge rules [Allentown Morning Call, earlier] [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/schools-roundup-10/">Schools roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Organizers of college conference on &#8220;intersection of health, humanities and disabilities&#8221; forget to make it accessible [<a href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/11/19/disability-studies-meeting-wasnt-accessible-those-disabilities">Inside Higher Ed</a>] </li>
<li>Law forbade disclosure re: sex offender classmate, now Seattle schools are paying assault victim $700,000 [<a href="http://kiro.tv/1gvRrqB">KIRO</a>]
 </li>
<li>Update: Lehigh U. student who sued over C+ grade won&#8217;t get a new trial, judge rules [<a href="http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-lehigh-university-student-sued-c-grade-ruling-20131125,0,919486.story">Allentown Morning Call</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2013/02/lehigh-u-student-sues-grade-seeks-1-3-m/">earlier</a>] </li>
<li>U.K.: &#8220;Refusal to allow your child to attend this trip will result in a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child’s education record&#8230;&#8221; [<a href="http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/11/refusal-to-allow-your-child-to-attend.html">Althouse</a>] </li>
<li>Truly awful idea SCOTUS has helped us <a href="http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2013/08/why-there-isnt-a-constitutional-right-to-an-education/">dodge so far</a>: constitutional right to education [<a href="http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2013/10/21/a-constitutional-right-to-education/">Andrew Sullivan</a>] </li>
<li>Washington Monthly <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/ten-miles-square/2013/11/what_are_institutional_review047608.php?">interviews Zach Schrag</a> on institutional review boards (IRBs) [earlier <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2013/07/now-available-sentence-first-verdict-afterward/">here</a> and <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2013/10/schools-roundup-9/">here</a>]; </li>
<li>Oldie but goodie: dissent from Second Circuit chief judge Dennis Jacobs on College of Staten Island student politics complaint [<a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1415386.html">Husain v. Springer</a>, <a href="http://federal-circuits.vlex.com/vid/husain-v-springer-35264156">alternate</a>]    </li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/colleges-and-universities/" title="colleges and universities" rel="tag">colleges and universities</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/disability-schools/" title="disability &amp; schools" rel="tag">disability &amp; schools</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/schools-roundup-10/">Schools roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: ADA might cover employee&#8217;s chronic tardiness</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/03/court-ada-might-cover-employees-chronic-tardiness/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/03/court-ada-might-cover-employees-chronic-tardiness/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabled rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=36760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Or, Prof. Bagenstos headlines it at Disability Law, &#8220;Second Circuit Holds Timely Arrival at Work Not Necessarily an Essential Job Function.&#8221; Reversing a summary judgment in favor of the employer, the judges found that a schizophrenic case worker whose medication caused morning drowsiness was entitled to a trial on his claim that he could have [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/03/court-ada-might-cover-employees-chronic-tardiness/">Court: ADA might cover employee&#8217;s chronic tardiness</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, Prof. Bagenstos headlines it at Disability Law, &#8220;Second Circuit Holds Timely Arrival at Work Not Necessarily an Essential Job Function.&#8221; Reversing a summary judgment in favor of the employer, the judges found that a schizophrenic case worker whose medication caused morning drowsiness was entitled to a trial on his claim that he could have accomplished the job by working extra to make up for time missed early in the day. [McMillian v. City of New York; <a href="http://disabilitylaw.blogspot.com/2013/03/second-circuit-holds-timely-arrival-at.html">Disability Law</a>; <a href="http://www.employmentlawblog.info/2013/03/mcmillian-v-city-of-new-york-no-11-3932-2d-cir-mar-4-2013.shtml">Paul Mollica, Outten &#038; Golden</a>]</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/disabled-rights/" title="disabled rights" rel="tag">disabled rights</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/03/court-ada-might-cover-employees-chronic-tardiness/">Court: ADA might cover employee&#8217;s chronic tardiness</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/03/court-ada-might-cover-employees-chronic-tardiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Jacobs strikes down DOMA sec. 3</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/judge-jacobs-strikes-doma-sec-3/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/judge-jacobs-strikes-doma-sec-3/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=33666</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Get ready for the cognitive dissonance among many on both left and right: Second Circuit chief judge Dennis Jacobs, long a favorite of the Federalist Society (and of mine), has written the opinion striking down section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in Windsor v. U.S. I have more at my Maryland for [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/judge-jacobs-strikes-doma-sec-3/">Judge Jacobs strikes down DOMA sec. 3</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get ready for the cognitive dissonance among many on both left and right: Second Circuit chief judge Dennis Jacobs, long a favorite of the Federalist Society (and of mine), has written the opinion striking down section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in Windsor v. U.S. I have more at my <a href="http://allmdfamilies.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/judge-jacobs-strikes-down-doma-section-3/">Maryland for All Families blog</a>.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/maryland/" title="Maryland" rel="tag">Maryland</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/military/" title="military" rel="tag">military</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/same-sex-marriage/" title="same-sex marriage" rel="tag">same-sex marriage</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/judge-jacobs-strikes-doma-sec-3/">Judge Jacobs strikes down DOMA sec. 3</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/10/judge-jacobs-strikes-doma-sec-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law schools roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/law-schools-roundup-13/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/law-schools-roundup-13/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=25879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Second Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes, at AALS meeting, gives legal academics frank appraisal of where law school needs fixing, to the delight of many of us who&#8217;ve advanced a broadly similar critique [Caron, Above the Law, Sloan/NLJ] &#8220;Let’s Regulate Harder. That’ll Provide More Jobs For Young Law Grads!&#8221; [my new Cato post, citing an official [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/law-schools-roundup-13/">Law schools roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Second Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes, at AALS meeting, gives legal academics frank appraisal of where law school needs fixing, to the delight of many of us who&#8217;ve advanced a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1594032335/overlawyerecomam/102-1927232-6988145">broadly similar critique</a> [<a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2012/01/judge-.html">Caron</a>, <a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2012/01/outsiders-criticize-law-schools-but-will-change-ever-come/">Above the Law</a>, <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202537684344&#038;slreturn=1">Sloan/NLJ</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;Let’s Regulate Harder. That’ll Provide More Jobs For Young Law Grads!&#8221; [<a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/lets-regulate-harder-thatll-provide-more-jobs-for-young-law-grads/">my new Cato post</a>, citing an official from the Society of American Law Teachers (SALT)]   </li>
<li>ABA accreditation rules discourage reliance on less expensive (and often more practice-oriented) adjunct faculty [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/business/after-law-school-associates-learn-to-be-lawyers.html">latest</a> in David Segal series on law schools in New York Times; <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202533322754">Catherine Dunn, Corporate Counsel</a>] Plus: video of law school accreditation panel at <a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/detail/law-school-accreditation-event-audiovideo">Federalist Society</a> national convention;  </li>
<li>Law school without undergrad degree first? Many other advanced countries do it that way [<a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2012/01/wsj-op-ed-first.html">McGinnis and Mangas</a>, Northwestern dean Dan Rodriguez <a href="http://deansblog.law.northwestern.edu/2012/01/17/wall-street-journal-post-on-killing-all-the-law-schools-a-reply/">response</a>, M&#038;M <a href="http://deansblog.law.northwestern.edu/2012/01/17/mcginnis-and-mangas-response/">rejoinder</a>; <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/outgoing_law_dean_offers_suggestions_admit_1ls_without_b.a._degrees_share_p/">ABA Journal</a> on views of NYLS&#8217;s Rick Matasar] Yet more on law school reform  [<a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2012/01/chen-the-.html">Jim Chen via Caron</a>, <a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2012/01/while-.html">Caron</a>, <a href="http://www.frumforum.com/dont-reform-law-school-abridge-it">Mark Yzaguirre, Frum Forum</a>]  </li>
<li>Complete point-counterpoint at ELF last summer on Tulane law clinic fracas (I&#8217;m counterpoint) [<a href="http://www.tulane.edu/~telc/assets/articles/Protectng%20Publ%20Partic.pdf">ELF</a>]  </li>
<li>Why not rob the rich? Ask Prof. Leiter [<a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/01/expropriating-the-rich.html">Sullivan</a>]  </li>
<li>Does law and economics amount to &#8220;studies in social engineering&#8221;? [<a href="http://www.fed-soc.org/publications/detail/law-school-accreditation-event-audiovideo">Kenneth Anderson</a>]  </li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/bar-associations/" title="bar associations" rel="tag">bar associations</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/law-schools/" title="law schools" rel="tag">law schools</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/law-schools-roundup-13/">Law schools roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2012/01/law-schools-roundup-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Second Circuit: Repeated Use of &#8216;Bitch&#8217; May Be Enough to Create Hostile Work Environment&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/second-circuit-repeated-use-of-bitch-may-be-enough-to-create-hostile-work-environment/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/second-circuit-repeated-use-of-bitch-may-be-enough-to-create-hostile-work-environment/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostile environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=19100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Paging Elizabeth Wurtzel! [Daniel Schwartz] More: Bainbridge. Tags: hostile environment, Second Circuit</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/second-circuit-repeated-use-of-bitch-may-be-enough-to-create-hostile-work-environment/">&#8220;Second Circuit: Repeated Use of &#8216;Bitch&#8217; May Be Enough to Create Hostile Work Environment&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paging <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bitch-Praise-Difficult-Elizabeth-Wurtzel/dp/0385484011">Elizabeth Wurtzel</a>! [<a href="http://www.ctemploymentlawblog.com/2010/08/articles/decisions-and-rulings/second-circuit-repeated-use-of-bitch-may-be-enough-to-create-hostile-work-environment/">Daniel Schwartz</a>] <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2010/08/context-matters.html">Bainbridge</a>.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/hostile-environment/" title="hostile environment" rel="tag">hostile environment</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/second-circuit-repeated-use-of-bitch-may-be-enough-to-create-hostile-work-environment/">&#8220;Second Circuit: Repeated Use of &#8216;Bitch&#8217; May Be Enough to Create Hostile Work Environment&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/08/second-circuit-repeated-use-of-bitch-may-be-enough-to-create-hostile-work-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big win for global-warming litigators</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/big-win-for-global-warming-litigators/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/big-win-for-global-warming-litigators/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A Second Circuit panel, reversing the district court judge, says a suit against utilities can go forward characterizing carbon dioxide as a nuisance. [American Lawyer, Point of Law first, second, third posts] Tags: climate change, global warming, Second Circuit</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/big-win-for-global-warming-litigators/">Big win for global-warming litigators</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Second Circuit panel, reversing the district court judge, says a suit against utilities can go forward characterizing carbon dioxide as a nuisance. [<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/digestTAL.jsp?id=1202433999470&#038;Second_Circuit_Rules_Warming_Suits_May_Proceed_Against_Power_Companies">American Lawyer</a>, Point of Law <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2009/09/2nd-circuit-rev.php">first</a>, <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2009/09/second-circuit-3.php">second</a>, <a href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2009/09/climate-lawsuit.php">third</a> posts]</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/climate-change/" title="climate change" rel="tag">climate change</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/global-warming/" title="global warming" rel="tag">global warming</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/big-win-for-global-warming-litigators/">Big win for global-warming litigators</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/09/big-win-for-global-warming-litigators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The return of Grand Theft Auto: Class Action</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/08/the-return-of-grand-theft-auto-class-action/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/08/the-return-of-grand-theft-auto-class-action/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Theft Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Circuit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>With a million dollars of attorneys&#8217; fees at stake, the trial lawyers in the infamous Grand Theft Auto case appealed the lower court decertification ruling to the Second Circuit. In response, I filed this brief today. Tags: CCAF, class action settlements, class actions, Grand Theft Auto, Second Circuit</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/08/the-return-of-grand-theft-auto-class-action/">The return of Grand Theft Auto: Class Action</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a million dollars of attorneys&#8217; fees at stake, the trial lawyers in <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/grand-theft-auto/">the infamous Grand Theft Auto case</a> <a href="http://sites.google.com/site/tedfrank/files-gta/09-1572-cv-p-appellant-brief.pdf?attredirects=0">appealed</a> the <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/07/grand-theft-auto-class-action-the-denouement/">lower court decertification ruling</a> to the Second Circuit.</p>
<p>In response, I <a href="http://sites.google.com/site/tedfrank/files-gta/09-1572-cv-objector-appellee-brief.pdf?attredirects=0">filed this brief</a> today.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/ccaf/" title="CCAF" rel="tag">CCAF</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/class-action-settlements/" title="class action settlements" rel="tag">class action settlements</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/class-actions/" title="class actions" rel="tag">class actions</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/grand-theft-auto/" title="Grand Theft Auto" rel="tag">Grand Theft Auto</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/second-circuit/" title="Second Circuit" rel="tag">Second Circuit</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/08/the-return-of-grand-theft-auto-class-action/">The return of Grand Theft Auto: Class Action</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/08/the-return-of-grand-theft-auto-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
