<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>smoking bans &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Environment roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/08/environment-roundup-61/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/08/environment-roundup-61/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use and zoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=72066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>End of the road at last for Steven Donziger, impresario of Chevron/Ecuador litigation? [Joe Nocera, Bloomberg] Building expensive housing improves housing availability at every income level [Sonja Trauss, Market Urbanism Report] &#8220;Ms. Durst did what any law-abiding citizen would do: She demolished the structure and tossed the twigs, moss and shells into the woods&#8230;. The [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/08/environment-roundup-61/">Environment roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>End of the road at last for Steven Donziger, impresario of <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/?s=chevron+ecuador">Chevron/Ecuador</a> litigation? [<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-07-12/chevron-nemesis-steven-donziger-pays-a-price-for-ecuador-lawsuit">Joe Nocera, Bloomberg</a>] </li>
<li>Building expensive housing improves housing availability at every income level [<a href="https://marketurbanismreport.com/does-adding-expensive-housing-help-the-little-guy/">Sonja Trauss, Market Urbanism Report</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;Ms. Durst did what any law-abiding citizen would do: She demolished the structure and tossed the twigs, moss and shells into the woods&#8230;. The fairy house wasn’t up to code.&#8221;  [<a href="https://regproject.org/hey-tinkerbell-get-fairy-house-code-coming/">Ellen Byron, WSJ</a>, courtesy Regulatory Transparency Project] </li>
<li>Last month&#8217;s <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/07/judge-throws-out-new-york-climate-lawsuit/">judicial rejection</a> of NYC climate suit came after <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/judge-skeptical-toward-new-york-city-climate-lawsuit/">plenty</a> of foreshadowing [<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/legalnewsline/2018/06/18/theyre-always-wrong-nycs-hired-guns-cite-reversed-decision-as-authority-for-climate-lawsuit/#5992a7fc7c4c">Daniel Fisher</a> (&#8220;persuasive authorities&#8221; were two overturned court decisions); <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-edit-climate-lawsuit-20180614-story.html">New York Daily News</a> and <a href="https://nypost.com/2018/06/30/de-blasio-should-prepare-to-have-his-environmental-lawsuit-tossed/">New York Post</a> editorials]  </li>
<li>Ban on smoking in public housing reflects truism that unless you own property, your home isn&#8217;t really your castle [<a href="https://abovethelaw.com/2018/08/your-home-is-your-castle-unless-youre-poor/">Shane Ferro, Above the Law</a>]  </li>
<li>Obama-era Waters of the U.S. regulations are a power grab asserting EPA control over farmers&#8217; ditches, seasonal moist depressions, and watering holes; one federal court has now reinstated the rules, but the issue is headed to SCOTUS and Congress in any case ought to kill them [<a href="https://reason.com/volokh/2018/08/16/federal-court-rejects-epa-attempt-to-sus">Jonathan Adler</a>; <a href="https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060094313">Ariel Wittenberg, E&#038;E News</a>; <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/03/potus-reopens-wotus/">earlier</a>]
</li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/chevron/" title="Chevron" rel="tag">Chevron</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/climate-change/" title="climate change" rel="tag">climate change</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/land-use-and-zoning/" title="land use and zoning" rel="tag">land use and zoning</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nyc/" title="NYC" rel="tag">NYC</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/08/environment-roundup-61/">Environment roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/08/environment-roundup-61/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police and community roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/police-community-roundup-3/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/police-community-roundup-3/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=62560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Fraternal Order of Police asks Amazon to stop allowing sales of Black Lives Matter shirts after Walmart.com yields to similar request [Ben Rosen, Christian Science Monitor] FOP boss Chuck Canterbury, defending civil asset forfeiture: hey we could use the money [Scott Shackford] FOP chief vows to override Pennsylvania governor&#8217;s veto of bill that would shield [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/police-community-roundup-3/">Police and community roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Fraternal Order of Police asks Amazon to stop allowing sales of Black Lives Matter shirts after Walmart.com yields to similar request [<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2016/1226/Police-union-to-Amazon-take-Bulletproof-Black-Lives-Matter-shirts-off-shelves">Ben Rosen, Christian Science Monitor</a>] FOP boss Chuck Canterbury, defending civil asset forfeiture: hey we could use the money [<a href="http://reason.com/blog/2017/01/04/police-union-head-wonders-why-everybody">Scott Shackford</a>] FOP chief vows to override Pennsylvania governor&#8217;s veto of bill that would shield names of involved police officers for 30 days after killings of civilians [<a href="http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2016/11/22/philly-fop-legislature-override-veto/">CBS Philadelphia</a>] </li>
<li>Technology panel from <a href="https://www.cato.org/events/state-american-criminal-justice">Cato policing conference</a> included law professors Tracey Meares of Yale and Elizabeth Joh of UC Davis, City of San Jose independent police auditor Walter Katz, and Maj. Max Geron of the Dallas PD, moderated by Cato&#8217;s Jonathan Blanks [<a href="https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2016/cc-12-07-16-03.mp4">video</a> or <a href="https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2016/cca-12-07-16-03.mp3">podcast</a>] &#8220;Police Spy Tools Evolve Faster Than Lawmakers Can Keep Up: Baltimore&#8217;s aerial surveillance continues unchecked&#8221; [<a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-baltimore-surveillance-project/">Monte Reel, Bloomberg BusinessWeek</a>]   </li>
<li>One effect of ban on smoking in New York City public housing: new excuse for cops to bust in [<a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2016/12/10/the-final-freedom-for-your-own-good/">Scott Greenfield</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;<a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/why-some-problem-cops-dont-lose-their-badges-1483115066">WSJ investigation</a>: Of 3,458 US police officers charged with crimes, 332 (10%) kept their badges&#8221; [@johngramlich] </li>
<li>&#8220;San Francisco has become a predatory government,&#8221; says its elected treasurer [<a href="http://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/San-Francisco-has-become-a-predatory-government-10641316.php">José Cisneros, San Francisco Chronicle</a>] </li>
<li>Don&#8217;t let quest to increase police accountability worsen problem of intrusive surveillance [<a href="https://www.cato.org/blog/dont-worsen-surveillance-quest-increase-police-accountability">Matthew Feeney</a> on <a href="https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2016/cc-12-14-16-06.mp4">Jake Laperruque presentation</a>  at Cato’s recent <a href="https://www.cato.org/events/2016-cato-surveillance-conference">surveillance conference</a>]   </li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/police/" title="police" rel="tag">police</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/police-unions/" title="police unions" rel="tag">police unions</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/san-francisco/" title="San Francisco" rel="tag">San Francisco</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/surveillance/" title="surveillance" rel="tag">surveillance</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/police-community-roundup-3/">Police and community roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/01/police-community-roundup-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2016/cc-12-07-16-03.mp4" length="1558062142" type="video/mp4" />
<enclosure url="https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2016/cca-12-07-16-03.mp3" length="85546109" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="https://cdn.cato.org/archive-2016/cc-12-14-16-06.mp4" length="417941314" type="video/mp4" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/10/medical-roundup-44/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/10/medical-roundup-44/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursing homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=61177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Judge Says He&#8217;s Had Enough Of Weeding Through Baseless Lawsuits, Threatens Sanctions&#8221; [Daniel Fisher; M. D. Georgia judge on vaginal mesh cases] More on pricey regulated generics [Scott Gottlieb/WSJ, earlier on EpiPen, more on latter from Joel Zinberg/City Journal] Feds ban pre-dispute arbitration agreements in nursing home care [McKnights] How Ronald Reagan&#8217;s FDA responded to [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/10/medical-roundup-44/">Medical roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>&#8220;Judge Says He&#8217;s Had Enough Of Weeding Through Baseless Lawsuits, Threatens Sanctions&#8221; [<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2016/09/08/judge-says-hes-had-enough-of-weeding-through-baseless-lawsuits-threatens-sanctions/#714da014e5d7">Daniel Fisher</a>; M. D. Georgia judge on vaginal mesh cases] </li>
<li>More on pricey regulated generics [<a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-obamas-fda-keeps-generic-drugs-off-the-market-1471645550">Scott Gottlieb/WSJ</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/09/scott-alexander-epipen-affair/">earlier</a> on EpiPen, more on latter from <a href="http://www.city-journal.org/html/why-so-pricey-epipen-14719.html">Joel Zinberg/City Journal</a>]    </li>
<li>Feds ban pre-dispute arbitration agreements in nursing home care [<a href="http://www.mcknights.com/news/cms-final-nursing-home-rule-bans-pre-dispute-arbitration-agreements/article/525666/">McKnights</a>] </li>
<li>How Ronald Reagan&#8217;s FDA responded to the AIDS crisis &#8212; and it&#8217;s probably not the story you&#8217;ve heard [<a href="http://www.city-journal.org/html/ronald-reagans-quiet-war-aids-14783.html">Peter Huber, City Journal</a>; <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/06/01/ronald_reagan_and_aids_correcting_the_record_122806.html">see also</a> from Carl Cannon in 2014]   </li>
<li>FDA regs likely to winnow smaller, distinctive makers from the cigar business, recalling a Somerset Maugham story [<a href="http://www.libertylawsite.org/2016/08/17/the-vicars-revenge-the-fda-the-new-regs-and-freedom-up-in-smoke/">James M. Patterson</a>] Debunking the &#8220;Helena miracle,&#8221; once more: no link between local smoking bans and short-term drops in heart attacks [<a href="http://reason.com/blog/2016/09/26/national-study-debunks-helena-smoking-ba">Jacob Sullum</a>, earlier <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/never-trust-content-from-us-surgeon-general/">here</a> and <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/10/first-rate-bilge-on-secondhand-smoke/">here</a>] </li>
<li>&#8220;Ethicists make the case for bone marrow transplantation markets&#8221;  [<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/09/12/ethicists-make-the-case-for-bone-marrow-transplantation-markets/?utm_term=.69072042d42a">Ilya Somin</a>]</li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/aids/" title="AIDS" rel="tag">AIDS</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/arbitration/" title="arbitration" rel="tag">arbitration</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/fda/" title="FDA" rel="tag">FDA</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nursing-homes/" title="nursing homes" rel="tag">nursing homes</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/pharmaceuticals/" title="pharmaceuticals" rel="tag">pharmaceuticals</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/tobacco/" title="tobacco" rel="tag">tobacco</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/10/medical-roundup-44/">Medical roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/10/medical-roundup-44/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>California raises smoking age to 21</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/california-raises-smoking-age-21/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/california-raises-smoking-age-21/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 15:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age of majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=59128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Young persons in California will have at least three years&#8217; practice voting to take away the rights of other persons before they acquire a full set of rights themselves. [CNN] P.S.: &#8220;Old enough to be executed, but not to have a final smoke. California logic.&#8221; [Scott Greenfield on Twitter] Tags: age of majority, California, smoking [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/california-raises-smoking-age-21/">California raises smoking age to 21</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Young persons in California will have at least three years&#8217; practice voting to take away the rights of other persons before they acquire a full set of rights themselves. [<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/health/california-smoking-age-21/index.html">CNN</a>]</p>
<p><strong>P.S.</strong>: &#8220;Old enough to be executed, but not to have a final smoke. California logic.&#8221; [Scott Greenfield on Twitter]</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/age-of-majority/" title="age of majority" rel="tag">age of majority</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/california/" title="California" rel="tag">California</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/california-raises-smoking-age-21/">California raises smoking age to 21</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2016/05/california-raises-smoking-age-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Despised lifestyles are now identified as noncontagious epidemics&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/despised-lifestyles-are-now-identified-as-noncontagious-epidemics/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/despised-lifestyles-are-now-identified-as-noncontagious-epidemics/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanny state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=56218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Pierre Lemieux in Cato&#8217;s Regulation magazine on the tendency of &#8220;public health&#8221; to pursue prescriptive moral reform in the guise of regulating health risks: “In many respects,” writes [Bernard] Turnock, “it is more reasonable to view public health as a movement than as a profession.” “Public health,” the Encyclopedia of Philosophy tells us, “is focused [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/despised-lifestyles-are-now-identified-as-noncontagious-epidemics/">&#8220;Despised lifestyles are now identified as noncontagious epidemics&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pierre Lemieux in Cato&#8217;s Regulation magazine on the <a href="http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2015/9/regulation-v38n3-4.pdf">tendency of &#8220;public health&#8221;</a> to pursue prescriptive moral reform in the guise of regulating health risks: </p>
<blockquote><p>“In many respects,” writes [Bernard] Turnock, “it is more reasonable to view public health as a movement than as a profession.” “Public health,” the Encyclopedia of Philosophy tells us, “is focused on regulation and public policy.” Public health experts claim a jurisdiction that covers anything related to welfare, little of which consists of genuine public goods. The basic thrust of public health is to remove decisions from the domain of individual choice. For example, public health experts believe that driving is a privilege, not a right, and probably extend this characterization to any activity that they don’t like or for which they think they would easily qualify (like parenting rights).</p>
<p>Slippery slopes mar the whole history of public health&#8230;if one wishes softer examples, from the treatment of the insane to Prohibition, to the current harassment of smokers, and to the partial nationalization of “public” places. Despite some reversals, the slope is as slippery as it ever was.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Related</strong>, cruel but predictable: HUD plans nationwide ban on letting public housing tenants smoke in their own units [<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/11/12/hud-proposes-smoking-ban-in-public-housing-citing-dangers-of-secondhand-smoke/">Washington Post</a>] </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nanny-state/" title="nanny state" rel="tag">nanny state</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/public-health/" title="public health" rel="tag">public health</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/despised-lifestyles-are-now-identified-as-noncontagious-epidemics/">&#8220;Despised lifestyles are now identified as noncontagious epidemics&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/11/despised-lifestyles-are-now-identified-as-noncontagious-epidemics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;De Blasio continues crusade against smoking at home&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/de-blasio-continues-crusade-against-smoking-at-home/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/de-blasio-continues-crusade-against-smoking-at-home/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 09:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advocacy funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord tenant law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=54000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The administration [of Mayor Bill de Blasio] is planning to select and pay four health-advocacy groups $9,000 apiece to pressure landlords and developers to prohibit smoking in their apartment complexes so neighboring tenants don’t inhale secondhand smoke.&#8221; [Carl Campanile/New York Post] Tags: advocacy funding, landlord tenant law, NYC, smoking bans</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/de-blasio-continues-crusade-against-smoking-at-home/">&#8220;De Blasio continues crusade against smoking at home&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The administration [of Mayor Bill de Blasio] is planning to select and pay four health-advocacy groups $9,000 apiece to pressure landlords and developers to prohibit smoking in their apartment complexes so neighboring tenants don’t inhale secondhand smoke.&#8221; [<a href="http://nypost.com/2015/06/28/de-blasio-continues-crusade-against-smoking-at-home/">Carl Campanile/New York Post</a>]  </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/advocacy-funding/" title="advocacy funding" rel="tag">advocacy funding</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/landlord-tenant-law/" title="landlord tenant law" rel="tag">landlord tenant law</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nyc/" title="NYC" rel="tag">NYC</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/de-blasio-continues-crusade-against-smoking-at-home/">&#8220;De Blasio continues crusade against smoking at home&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2015/07/de-blasio-continues-crusade-against-smoking-at-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;NYC Council Bans Public Vaping&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/nyc-council-bans-public-vaping/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/nyc-council-bans-public-vaping/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Because It Looks Too Much Like Smoking.&#8221; The invention and rapid spread in popularity of e-cigarettes might be seen as a sort of lab experiment to test the proposition: when you banned smoking, were you mostly concerned about the spillover effects on third parties or mostly being paternalistic toward tobacco users? [Jacob Sullum, Reason] Tags: [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/nyc-council-bans-public-vaping/">&#8220;NYC Council Bans Public Vaping&#8230;&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Because It Looks Too Much Like Smoking.&#8221; The invention and rapid spread in popularity of e-cigarettes might be seen as a sort of lab experiment to test the proposition: when you banned smoking, were you mostly concerned about the spillover effects on third parties or mostly being paternalistic toward tobacco users? [<a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/19/nyc-council-bans-public-vaping-because-i">Jacob Sullum, Reason</a>]</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nyc/" title="NYC" rel="tag">NYC</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/nyc-council-bans-public-vaping/">&#8220;NYC Council Bans Public Vaping&#8230;&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/nyc-council-bans-public-vaping/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secondhand smoke: study unable to find lung cancer link</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/secondhand-smoke-study-unable-find-lung-cancer-link/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/secondhand-smoke-study-unable-find-lung-cancer-link/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=43005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Considering that whole edifices of regulation are built on the premise of the lethal nature of &#8220;passive&#8221; smoking, you&#8217;d think the press might pay at least passing attention to reports like this one: a big study of more than 76,000 women found no link between lung cancer and secondhand smoke, which tends to confirm earlier [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/secondhand-smoke-study-unable-find-lung-cancer-link/">Secondhand smoke: study unable to find lung cancer link</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that whole edifices of regulation are built on the premise of the lethal nature of &#8220;passive&#8221; smoking, you&#8217;d think the press might pay at least passing attention to reports like this one: a big study of more than 76,000 women found no link between lung cancer and secondhand smoke, which tends to confirm earlier studies also consistent with zero or undetectable association. [<a href="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/12/05/jnci.djt365.extract">Journal of the National Cancer Institute</a>; <a href="http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com/2013/12/new-study-finds-no-link-between.html">Christopher Snowdon</a>] <strong>More</strong>: <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/12/16/is-it-safe-yet-to-have-an-honest-convers">Jacob Sullum</a> (&#8220;Now they tell us.&#8221;)</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/secondhand-smoke-study-unable-find-lung-cancer-link/">Secondhand smoke: study unable to find lung cancer link</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/12/secondhand-smoke-study-unable-find-lung-cancer-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Rafael, Calif. passes own-home smoking ban</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/san-rafael-calif-passes-home-smoking-ban/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/san-rafael-calif-passes-home-smoking-ban/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ban applies to privately owned homes that share a party wall with another home. [ABC News] The rationale, per city official Rebecca Woodbury: &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s owner-occupied or renter-occupied. We didn&#8217;t want to discriminate. The distinguishing feature is the shared wall.&#8221; As justification for the rule, she cited studies showing that secondhand [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/san-rafael-calif-passes-home-smoking-ban/">San Rafael, Calif. passes own-home smoking ban</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ban applies to privately owned homes that share a party wall with another home. [<a href="http://realestate.aol.com/blog/2013/11/21/smoking-ban-san-rafael/">ABC News</a>] The rationale, per city official Rebecca Woodbury: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It doesn&#8217;t matter if it&#8217;s owner-occupied or renter-occupied. We didn&#8217;t want to discriminate. The distinguishing feature is the shared wall.&#8221; As justification for the rule, she cited studies showing that secondhand smoke seeped through ventilating ducts <em>and walls, even through cracks</em> [emphasis added &#8212; W.O.]. &#8220;It depends on a building&#8217;s construction,&#8221; she said, &#8220;but it does affect the unit next door, with the negative health impacts due to smoke.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>San Rafael is in affluent Marin County just north of San Francisco. Woodbury said there had been hardly any opposition to the ordinance: &#8220;We have a very low percentage of smokers in the county,&#8221; she said. On proposals in Berkeley, Calif. to ban some smoking in private homes, see <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2013/11/toward-domestic-frontier/">this recent post</a>. </p>
<p><strong>P.S.</strong> With end-of-year donation time coming on, I won&#8217;t be writing any checks to groups like the American Lung Association that <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/25/it-is-now-illegal-to-smoke-in">support this sort of thing</a>. Plenty of deserving health and research charities do great work while being respectful of individual liberty and property rights.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/bay-area/" title="Bay Area" rel="tag">Bay Area</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/san-rafael-calif-passes-home-smoking-ban/">San Rafael, Calif. passes own-home smoking ban</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/san-rafael-calif-passes-home-smoking-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toward the domestic frontier</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/toward-domestic-frontier/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/toward-domestic-frontier/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 04:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking bans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=42571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Berkeley, Calif. councilman Jesse Arreguin proposes banning smoking in private single family homes when children, seniors or lodgers are present [San Francisco Chronicle] More: I&#8217;m quoted by Chronicle columnist Debra Saunders: In deference to the secondhand smoke rationale, Arreguin suggests that the ban apply if a minor lives in the home, &#8220;a nonsmoking elder, 62 [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/toward-domestic-frontier/">Toward the domestic frontier</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berkeley, Calif. councilman Jesse Arreguin proposes banning smoking in private single family homes when children, seniors or lodgers are present [<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Berkeley-s-next-smoking-ban-may-hit-home-4984302.php">San Francisco Chronicle</a>]  </p>
<p><strong>More</strong>: I&#8217;m quoted by <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/saunders/article/Secondhand-smoke-gets-in-your-rights-4992161.php">Chronicle columnist Debra Saunders</a>:  </p>
<blockquote><p>In deference to the secondhand smoke rationale, Arreguin suggests that the ban apply if a minor lives in the home, &#8220;a nonsmoking elder, 62 years of age or older is present&#8221; or any other &#8220;non-smoking lodger is present.&#8221;</p>
<p>Walter Olson of the libertarian Cato Institute compares the Berkeley nanny ordinance to secondhand smoke itself: &#8220;They are seeping under our doors now to get into places where they&#8217;re not wanted.&#8221;</p>
<p>He faults &#8220;ever more ambitious smoking bans&#8221; that rework the definition of private space. &#8220;Now they&#8217;re really just saying it doesn&#8217;t matter if you have the consent of everyone in the room.&#8221; Olson savored Arreguin&#8217;s suggestion that 63-year-olds cannot consent to being near a smoker.</p></blockquote>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/bay-area/" title="Bay Area" rel="tag">Bay Area</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/smoking-bans/" title="smoking bans" rel="tag">smoking bans</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/toward-domestic-frontier/">Toward the domestic frontier</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2013/11/toward-domestic-frontier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
