sovereign immunity – Overlawyered

Liability roundup

Walter Olson — Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:59:34 +0000

A win for class action objector Ted Frank as Seventh Circuit allows him to challenge what he described as “objector blackmail” payments to other intervenors [Amanda Bronstad, National Law Journal, Pearson v. NBTY]
City of Seattle pays $13 million to settle suit alleging negligent probation supervision of drunk driver [Jessica Lee, Seattle Times, Brian Flores, KCPQ, my 2005 take on Washington’s unique rules on sovereign immunity and more]
“Family sues Dum Dum lollipop maker over son’s alleged choking incident” [Alexandria Hein, Fox News]
Thanks to New York’s Scaffold Law, co-op and condo boards “can be held liable for millions of dollars in damages – even if the injured worker was drunk or failed to use safety equipment.” [Habitat mag] “Coverage for East Side Access [infrastructure project] has surpassed half a billion dollars” [Will Bredderman, Crain’s New York]
As Brett Kavanaugh’s SeaWorld dissent shows, he’s a judge who takes assumption of risk seriously [ABA Journal, SeaWorld v. Perez]
Twiqbal pleading standards continue to do good, this time in New York state courts [Drug & Device Law]

Tags: assumption of risk, New York state, pleading, sovereign immunity, Ted Frank, Washington state

Liability roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

TSA agents mostly can’t be sued

Walter Olson — Sat, 14 Jul 2018 14:02:40 +0000

The Third Circuit has ruled that TSA (Transportation Security Administration) screeners are largely immune from being sued for overly intrusive handling of travelers’ persons, false imprisonment, and similar offenses. “The majority said it was ‘sympathetic’ to concerns that its decision would leave fliers with ‘very limited legal redress'” for abuse, but said its hands were tied by the terms of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA); TSA screeners, it said, were shielded from liability because they were not “investigative or law enforcement officers” but more akin to — and I am not making this up — federal meat inspectors. [Jonathan Stempel, Reuters; Fredrick Kunkle, Washington Post (meat inspector reference; court “acknowledged that as a result, passengers have very limited legal options even in the face of outrageous TSA misconduct.”); Pellegrino v. TSA]

Tags: airlines, public employment, sovereign immunity

TSA agents mostly can’t be sued is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

They fought the EPA and the EPA won

Walter Olson — Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:13:02 +0000

From John Ross’s Short Circuit newsletter for the Institute for Justice, Mar. 10: “Allegation: EPA agents lead armed raid of Casper, Wyo. laboratory based on false accusation from former employee, an 18 year old, that the lab falsified water-quality records. Five years later, case dismissed against former lab owners without charges. They sue the EPA. District court: It’s too late to sue; the two-year statute of limitations started running when you lost the lab. Tenth Circuit: Actually, you couldn’t have even sued then because sovereign immunity.” [Garling v. EPA]

Tags: Environmental Protection Agency, sovereign immunity, Tenth Circuit, Wyoming

They fought the EPA and the EPA won is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Don’t delegate foreign and counter-terror policy to trial lawyers

Walter Olson — Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:52:01 +0000

The Washington Post’s editorialists agree with former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton and former attorney general Michael Mukasey: President Obama is right to plan a veto of a bill passed in the House by a voice vote enabling lawsuits by victims of terror attacks against sovereign countries such as Saudi Arabia over conduct that allegedly contributed to the attacks. Delegating foreign and counter-terror policy to trial lawyers not only wrenches away delicate questions of negotiation and sanctions-imposition from the executive branch to which our Constitutional scheme confides them, but also invites foreign legal systems to begin opening up avenues for lawsuits against the government of the United States. There’s a reason comity and sovereign immunity have stood for centuries as pillars of international law. News coverage: Karoun Demirjian, Washington Post and more.

Tags: international law, Saudi Arabia, September 11, sovereign immunity, terrorism

Don’t delegate foreign and counter-terror policy to trial lawyers is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Saudis: We might sell off $750 billion in US assets if opened to 9/11 suits

Walter Olson — Mon, 18 Apr 2016 04:15:30 +0000

I take a dim view of the doings of the Riyadh regime, but it’s bonkers to let US-Saudi relations stand or fall on the skill of random trial lawyers. A bill under consideration in Congress would bring such a day closer by stripping sovereign immunity protection from foreign countries in suits alleging responsibility for terror attacks on U.S. soil. It is the executive branch exercising its foreign relations powers that should have the final word on such responsibility; the U.S. State Department opposes the legislation. [Tim Worstall, Forbes]

Tags: Saudi Arabia, September 11, sovereign immunity, terrorism

Saudis: We might sell off $750 billion in US assets if opened to 9/11 suits is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

You lose, Illinois taxpayers

Walter Olson — Sun, 07 Feb 2016 16:55:43 +0000

A big win for plaintiff’s lawyers: “Rewriting decades of established law in Illinois, the [state’] high court — by a 4-3 margin — repealed the public-duty doctrine that holds local government entities, including fire and police departments, owe their duty to protect to the general public, not individual citizens. The lawsuit opens the way for individuals to sue governmental entities based on some claim of harm caused to them as a result of the public entity’s negligence.” [Champaign-Urbana News-Gazette, Cook County Record, Municipal Minute; some related issues of government duty-to-protect exposure from the state of Washington]

Tags: fire departments, Illinois, police, sovereign immunity, taxpayers

You lose, Illinois taxpayers is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Plaintiff wants to bring Austrian train crash claim to U.S. courts

Walter Olson — Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:15:32 +0000

At the Supreme Court’s first oral argument of its new term, “the court’s most liberal justices joined in criticizing the idea the Austrian national railway could be liable simply for allowing its tickets to be sold in the U.S. Carol Sachs v. OBB Personenverkehr revolves around whether the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act protects the state-owned rail company from being sued in U.S. courts over injuries that occur overseas. Judging from the arguments, it can. Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor all expressed doubt that OBB could be liable simply because Sachs bought a Eurailpass through a Massachusetts online ticket agency.” The Ninth Circuit had allowed the case of Sachs v. OBB Personenverkehr to go forward over “strenuous dissents from several of its judges.” [Daniel Fisher, Forbes]

Tags: Europe, forum shopping, railroads, sovereign immunity, Supreme Court

Plaintiff wants to bring Austrian train crash claim to U.S. courts is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

“Risk and Legal Fear in Schools,” part II

Walter Olson — Sat, 08 Jun 2013 11:43:16 +0000

I’ve now done a second post in Common Good’s symposium on education and fear of liability. Among the topics I discuss: assumption of risk, statutes of limitations, sovereign immunity, and the need for some more organized way of advocating the interests of public service entities against excessive or impractical liability demands. You can read it here.

Tags: assumption of risk, schools, sovereign immunity, statutes of limitations

“Risk and Legal Fear in Schools,” part II is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Washington: “high court allows lawsuit over 911 response”

Walter Olson — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:22:44 +0000

“The family of a man shot and killed by his neighbor in Skagit County can proceed to trial on claims that the county’s emergency communications center mishandled its response to his panicked 911 call, Washington’s Supreme Court ruled.” According to his family, a 911 operator told William Munich that help was on the way but did not code the call as an emergency; a sheriff’s deputy showed up 18 minutes later, by which time Munich had been shot by the irate neighbor. “I am concerned the majority’s decision will put unwarranted pressure on every statement made by 911 operators, straining communications that depend on the free flow of information,” wrote dissenting Justice James Johnson. [KOMO; Munich (Gayle) v. Skagit Emergency Communications Center, holding, dissent (wrong link fixed now); background on Washington’s unusual approach to sovereign immunity]

P.S. Another Washington sovereign liability case of interest: Robb v. City of Seattle, “Whether the city of Seattle may be liable in an action for wrongful death brought by the survivor of a murder victim based on the failure of police to confiscate ammunition while detaining the murderer for questioning just before the murder occurred.” [Temple of Justice]

Tags: emergency services, police, sovereign immunity, third party liability for crime, Washington state

Washington: “high court allows lawsuit over 911 response” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Election roundup

Walter Olson — Tue, 06 Nov 2012 04:04:25 +0000

Dan Mitchell rounds up many of the significant state ballot measures [Cato] California official voter guide is 144 pages long; “As usual, almost all of the proposals being put before voters are bad.” [Josh Barro, Bloomberg; coverage of Prop 37 on genetic labeling here, here, etc.]
And as some readers will recall, I am hoping voters in Maine, Washington and my own state of Maryland vote to extend civil marriage to same-sex couples, and that voters in Minnesota reject a constitutional amendment to the opposite effect.
Digging into the Obama-Romney dispute over use-it-or-lose-it oil leases [Daniel Fisher, Forbes]
“The myth of auto bailout jobs” [Andrew M. Grossman, DC Examiner] On Jeeps, Romney takes a leaf from the Obama tactical playbook, and Obama not pleased [Tim Carney, Examiner]
New Cato e-book “The Libertarian Vote: Swing Voters, Tea Parties, and the Fiscally Conservative, Socially Liberal Center” by David Boaz, David Kirby, and Emily Ekins, doing well on Amazon Kindle listings. And: which way should a libertarian vote for President this time? [Richard Epstein]
“Survey of State Supreme Court Races and Retention Elections” [Carrie Severino, NRO, Ashby Jones/WSJ; earlier on Michigan here and here, on Florida here, here, and here]
Government officials pressure private billboard owner to take down “Voter Fraud Is a Felony” sign [Hans Bader]
Peaceful transfer of power to opposition party is gold standard of democracy [Steve Chapman]
“As churches get political, IRS stays quiet” [Reuters, earlier]
“Editorial: Inslee’s criticism of McKenna points up need for tort reform” [Seattle Times; my take on Washington state’s curious waiver of sovereign immunity a while back]

Tags: autos, Barack Obama, California, churches, Florida, Michigan, Mitt Romney, sovereign immunity, Washington state

Election roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system