Super Bowl – Overlawyered

“Why the SUPER BOWL® is the specialest trademark ever”

Walter Olson — Tue, 06 Feb 2018 05:05:27 +0000

Ron Coleman at Likelihood of Confusion rounds up years of silliness, some of which we’ve covered here in the past.

“Why the SUPER BOWL® is the specialest trademark ever” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Ready for the Super Concave Serving Vessel?

Walter Olson — Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:45:20 +0000

Hilarious commercial from Staples makes fun of the trademark claims that keep businesses from talking about Super-You-Know-What sales, events, and gatherings this time of year. Earlier here, etc., etc.

Tags: Super Bowl

Ready for the Super Concave Serving Vessel? is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Super Bowl ads in review

Walter Olson — Tue, 04 Feb 2014 03:58:59 +0000

A Georgia lawyer aired an ad bizarre enough that it’s made the rounds of the legal sites:

More from Lowering the Bar (“As Rolling Stone suggests, it is a little problematic that the ad depicts him desecrating a grave and smashing a grave marker, even if he does it with a flaming sledgehammer named after his dead brother and to a badass metal soundtrack.”)

Meanwhile, over at Cato at Liberty, I’ve got a commentary on the Coca-Cola ad with at least a tangential relation to language law, the legacy of Teddy Roosevelt’s Progressives, and the gracefulness of being good winners regarding the success of English assimilation.

Tags: chasing clients, Georgia, immigration law, Super Bowl, WO writings

Super Bowl ads in review is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

New Jersey suit: Super Bowl tickets improperly not sold at face value

Walter Olson — Thu, 09 Jan 2014 04:15:35 +0000

A lawyer representing a fan has sued the National Football League for allegedly breaking New Jersey state law by making just 1 percent of Super Bowl tickets available to the general public at face value. A section of the state’s Consumer Fraud Act reads, “It shall be an unlawful practice for a person, who has access to tickets to an event prior to the tickets’ release for sale to the general public, to withhold those tickets from sale to the general public in an amount exceeding 5% of all available seating for the event.” (But does “person [with] access” refer to the original event organizers, or only to middlemen who acquire tickets for resale?) The lawsuit “says it’s on behalf of all ticket buyers who have paid more than face amount for their tickets, along with anybody who couldn’t afford to buy tickets in an exorbitant secondary market, but who still wanted them.” [NJ.com] More: the NFL made me do it! [Abnormal Use]

Tags: class actions, football, New Jersey, Super Bowl

New Jersey suit: Super Bowl tickets improperly not sold at face value is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Samsung Super Bowl ad

Walter Olson — Mon, 04 Feb 2013 16:08:46 +0000

It makes fun of the NFL’s overzealous protection of the Super Bowl trademark:

Tags: Super Bowl, trademarks

Samsung Super Bowl ad is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Super Bowl (TM) trademark controversy XLVI, or even higher

Walter Olson — Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:42:00 +0000

Ron Coleman has yet another installment in the ongoing annual saga of legal jeopardy for organizations that promote their wares (big-screen TVs, snacks) by referring to a certain football weekend event as the “Super Bowl,” rather that dodge behind the phrase “Big Game” or something equivalent. He corrects Consumer Reports on its assertion that the law provides an exemption for “news organizations,” which is not actually the case, though many uses by news organizations would in practice be exempted as fair use. Earlier here, etc.

More: “It’s Time to Stand Up to the NFL and Call It the Superbowl” [Paul Alan Levy]

Tags: Super Bowl, trademarks

Super Bowl (TM) trademark controversy XLVI, or even higher is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Lindsey Lohan sues E-trade over baby commercial

Ted Frank — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:04:12 +0000

On Super Bowl Sunday, E-Trade ran one of their annoying talking-baby commercials; this one featured a blond baby named “Lindsay” (the 380th most popular baby-girl name in 2008) that another baby calls a “milk-aholic.” This, says 23-year-old Lindsay Lohan, was a violation of the rights to her “name and characterization”; she’s sued in Nassau County, New York state court, and is asking for $100 million. The advertising agency says Baby Lindsay was named after someone on the ad team. [lawsuit via TMZ; NY Post; Reuters]

Commenter Richard Nieporent reminds us of the similar Spike Lee vs. Spike TV silliness.

Tags: advertising, celebrities, Lindsay Lohan, New York state, right of publicity, Super Bowl

Lindsey Lohan sues E-trade over baby commercial is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

“Top Six Super Bowl-Related Lawsuits”

Walter Olson — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:02:38 +0000

As collected by Bitter Lawyer.

Tags: Super Bowl

“Top Six Super Bowl-Related Lawsuits” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

February 3 roundup

Walter Olson — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:24:43 +0000

Many of our readers liked the ruling, but someone didn’t: “Judge censured for ordering class-action lawyer to take pay in $125,000 worth of gift-cards” [BoingBoing, ABA Journal, Leonard/L.A. Times, Lowering the Bar]
“NFL Concedes In Who Dat Battle” [Lowering the Bar, more, earlier; here’s a protest t-shirt, and more on those]
Some plaintiff’s lawyers give their side of the story, disputing fraud allegations in Dole banana-worker pesticide cases [Bronstad, NLJ, earlier]
“Google Blog Bundle — 42 criminal defense blogs” [Mark Bennett] And while you’re at it, why not take a moment right now to put Overlawyered in your RSS blog reader?
Massachusetts hardball: state lawmaker says private law schools might be breaking antitrust laws in working to oppose state school proposed in his district [ABA Journal via Above the Law; public law school plan OK’d]
Making the rounds: why medieval trial by ordeal may not have been so crazy after all [Peter Leeson, Boston Globe and full paper (PDF) via Volokh]
“Rothstein E-Mails Reveal Role of Former Plaintiffs’ Lawyer” [Brian Baxter, AmLaw Litigation Daily]
Obama: I tried to reach across aisle on medical liability reform but GOP wasn’t nibbling. Fact check please [Wood, PoL]

Tags: antitrust, banana pesticide litigation fraud, Barack Obama, class action settlements, coupon settlements, football, law schools, Massachusetts, medical malpractice, Scott Rothstein, Super Bowl

February 3 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

NFL enforcement of “Super Bowl” trademark

Walter Olson — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:58:13 +0000

Every year it seems to get worse, or better, depending on your perspective, notes Ron Coleman. Earlier years here, here, here, etc., as well as “Who Dat?”

Tags: Super Bowl, trademarks

NFL enforcement of “Super Bowl” trademark is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system