<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unruh Act &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>A &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Night&#8221; carve-out</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/a-ladies-night-carve-out/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladies' nights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unruh Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=23907</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nevada has passed a law banning sex discrimination, but, perhaps wary of the litigious track record of California&#8217;s Unruh Act, has exempted &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Nights&#8221; promotions. [Las Vegas Sun] Tags: ladies&#039; nights, Nevada, Unruh Act</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/a-ladies-night-carve-out/">A &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Night&#8221; carve-out</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevada has passed a law banning sex discrimination, but, perhaps wary of the <a href="http://overlawyered.com/tag/ladies-nights/">litigious track record</a> of California&#8217;s Unruh Act, has exempted &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Nights&#8221; promotions. [<a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/jul/13/ladies-night-remains-legal/">Las Vegas Sun</a>] </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/ladies-nights/" title="ladies&#039; nights" rel="tag">ladies&#039; nights</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/nevada/" title="Nevada" rel="tag">Nevada</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/" title="Unruh Act" rel="tag">Unruh Act</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2011/07/a-ladies-night-carve-out/">A &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Night&#8221; carve-out</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public accommodation laws</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/05/public-accommodation-laws/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/05/public-accommodation-laws/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 10:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unruh Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=17561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy recalls a 2006 lawsuit over whether neo-Nazis had a right to wear swastika pins in a Southern California restaurant against its management&#8217;s wishes, and extensive reader discussion ensues. Tags: California, discrimination law, Unruh Act</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/05/public-accommodation-laws/">Public accommodation laws</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy recalls a 2006 lawsuit over whether neo-Nazis had a right to wear swastika pins in a Southern California restaurant against its management&#8217;s wishes, and <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/05/25/some-strange-consequences-of-public-accommodations-laws/">extensive reader discussion ensues</a>.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/california/" title="California" rel="tag">California</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/discrimination-law/" title="discrimination law" rel="tag">discrimination law</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/" title="Unruh Act" rel="tag">Unruh Act</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/05/public-accommodation-laws/">Public accommodation laws</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2010/05/public-accommodation-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Setback for a &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Day&#8221; suit</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/08/setback-for-a-ladies-day-suit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladies' nights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skiing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unruh Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=13067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Serial suit-filer Alfred Rava wanted to use his lawsuit against Bear Valley Ski Resort over a &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Day&#8221; promotion as the basis for a class action, but a judge ruled that he&#8217;s not entitled to do that, because California&#8217;s Unruh Act already provides for him to get a $4,000 payday with no need to show [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/08/setback-for-a-ladies-day-suit/">Setback for a &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Day&#8221; suit</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serial suit-filer Alfred Rava wanted to use his lawsuit against Bear Valley Ski Resort over a &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Day&#8221; promotion as the basis for a class action, but a judge ruled that he&#8217;s not entitled to do that, because California&#8217;s Unruh Act already provides for him to get a $4,000 payday with no need to show injury: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Assuming plaintiff succeeds on the merits, Bear Valley Ski Resort would be liable for mandatory statutory penalties of $4,000 X 995 putative class members,&#8221; [Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Anthony] Mohr wrote. &#8220;The product of $3,980,000 constitutes a draconian sum that would strip Bear Valley of its assets.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>[<a href="http://legalpad.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/07/yesterday-our-sister-publication-cal-law-had-the-man-bites-dog-story-of-the-consumer-attorneys-of-california-backing-a-tort-r.html">Cal Law &#8220;Legal Pad&#8221;</a> via <a href="http://www.calbizlit.com/cal_biz_lit/2009/07/trial-court-strikes-blow-for-common-sense-in-antiladies-day-case.html">Cal Biz Lit</a>, <a href="http://legalpad.typepad.com/files/rava-order.pdf">court order</a> in PDF]</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/ladies-nights/" title="ladies&#039; nights" rel="tag">ladies&#039; nights</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/skiing/" title="skiing" rel="tag">skiing</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/" title="Unruh Act" rel="tag">Unruh Act</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/08/setback-for-a-ladies-day-suit/">Setback for a &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Day&#8221; suit</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexual harassment lawsuits of the future: Comic-Con edition</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/sexual-harassment-lawsuits-of-the-future-comic-con-edition/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/sexual-harassment-lawsuits-of-the-future-comic-con-edition/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unruh Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Electronic Arts surely has better lawyers than the ones who signed off on this contest (h/t cirocco), which merely asks for a standard grip-and-grin photo, but can be read to require photos of &#8220;acts of lust&#8221; upon booth models. And that&#8217;s not even taking account of the Alfred Ravas of the world, since Comic-Con is [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/sexual-harassment-lawsuits-of-the-future-comic-con-edition/">Sexual harassment lawsuits of the future: Comic-Con edition</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electronic Arts surely has better lawyers than the ones who signed off on <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/07/ea-puts-sexual-bounty-on-the-heads-of-its-own-booth-babes.ars">this contest</a> (h/t cirocco), which merely asks for a standard grip-and-grin photo, but can be read to require photos of &#8220;acts of lust&#8221; upon booth models.  And that&#8217;s not even taking account of the <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/wheres-his-mothers-day-present/">Alfred Ravas of the world</a>, since Comic-Con is in San Diego, and thus subject to the Unruh Act&#8230;</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/california/" title="California" rel="tag">California</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/harassment-law/" title="harassment law" rel="tag">harassment law</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/humor/" title="humor" rel="tag">humor</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/" title="Unruh Act" rel="tag">Unruh Act</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/sexual-harassment-lawsuits-of-the-future-comic-con-edition/">Sexual harassment lawsuits of the future: Comic-Con edition</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/sexual-harassment-lawsuits-of-the-future-comic-con-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;California bill would protect discounts for state workers&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/california-bill-would-protect-discounts-for-state-workers/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/california-bill-would-protect-discounts-for-state-workers/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladies' nights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unruh Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=12238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What happened to Sacramento businesses when they offered &#8220;Furlough Friday&#8221; discounts to state workers whose pay had been cut? They found themselves the target of demand letters from an unnamed entrepreneurial San Diego lawyer who alleged that the discounts violated the state&#8217;s famously broad Unruh Act ban on discrimination, and demanded cash settlements. Lawmakers took [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/california-bill-would-protect-discounts-for-state-workers/">&#8220;California bill would protect discounts for state workers&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to Sacramento businesses when they offered &#8220;Furlough Friday&#8221; discounts to state workers whose pay had been cut? They found themselves the target of demand letters from an unnamed entrepreneurial San Diego lawyer who alleged that the discounts violated the state&#8217;s famously broad Unruh Act ban on discrimination, and demanded cash settlements. Lawmakers took the step of seeking and obtaining the support of the powerful state trial-lawyers&#8217; group, Consumer Attorneys of California, for remedial legislation, which is &#8220;something you don&#8217;t see every day: trial lawyers backing a bill that would eliminate some lawsuits.&#8221;  [<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/2011602.html">Sacramento Bee</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: According to <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/07/lawyer-targets-discounts-for-furloughed-state-workers.html">Patrick McGreevy of the L.A. Times</a> (h/t &#8220;Patw&#8221; in comments), the attorney is Alfred Rava of &#8220;Mother&#8217;s Day stadium suit&#8221; fame (<a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/rick-reilly-on-the-oakland-mothers-day-stadium-suit/">Jun. 12</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/06/the-exploits-of-alfred-rava-contd/">Jun. 17</a>, etc.) </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/ladies-nights/" title="ladies&#039; nights" rel="tag">ladies&#039; nights</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/" title="Unruh Act" rel="tag">Unruh Act</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/california-bill-would-protect-discounts-for-state-workers/">&#8220;California bill would protect discounts for state workers&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/07/california-bill-would-protect-discounts-for-state-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Reilly on the Oakland Mother&#8217;s Day-stadium suit</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/rick-reilly-on-the-oakland-mothers-day-stadium-suit/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/rick-reilly-on-the-oakland-mothers-day-stadium-suit/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladies' nights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unruh Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=11698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By reader acclaim: ESPN&#8217;s Rick Reilly is righteously hacked off at California serial litigator Alfred Rava and his sex discrimination settlement over an Oakland A&#8217;s breast cancer promotion which gave out floppy sun hats on Mother&#8217;s Day to women attending the game but not (horrors) to men. (&#8220;Make $100 the sleazy way&#8220;): So how many [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/rick-reilly-on-the-oakland-mothers-day-stadium-suit/">Rick Reilly on the Oakland Mother&#8217;s Day-stadium suit</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By reader acclaim: ESPN&#8217;s Rick Reilly is righteously hacked off at California serial litigator Alfred Rava and his sex discrimination settlement over an Oakland A&#8217;s breast cancer promotion which gave out floppy sun hats on Mother&#8217;s Day to women attending the game but not (horrors) to men. (&#8220;<a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=reilly_rick&#038;id=4247723">Make $100 the sleazy way</a>&#8220;): </p>
<blockquote><p>So how many guys have lined up to get their rightful floppy-hat-equivalent payment that was stolen from them by those selfish Mother&#8217;s Day-manipulating women? &#8220;Well, I haven&#8217;t taken a single call so far,&#8221; said the 1-888 operator at the firm handling claims. &#8220;And I&#8217;m here just about every day.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Earlier coverage of Rava&#8217;s Oakland suit <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/02/february-1-roundup-2/">here</a>, and on his earlier suit over an Anaheim Angels Mother&#8217;s Day tote bag giveaway <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/wheres-his-mothers-day-present/">here</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/05/baseball-club-to-hold-frivolous-lawsuit-night/">here</a>, <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2006/08/update-mothers-day-stadium-promotion/">here</a>, and <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2007/02/plaintiff-strikes-out-in-lawsuit-over-angels-bag-giveaway/">here</a>. </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/baseball/" title="baseball" rel="tag">baseball</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/california/" title="California" rel="tag">California</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/ladies-nights/" title="ladies&#039; nights" rel="tag">ladies&#039; nights</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/sex-discrimination/" title="sex discrimination" rel="tag">sex discrimination</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/" title="Unruh Act" rel="tag">Unruh Act</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/rick-reilly-on-the-oakland-mothers-day-stadium-suit/">Rick Reilly on the Oakland Mother&#8217;s Day-stadium suit</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/06/rick-reilly-on-the-oakland-mothers-day-stadium-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miley Cyrus eye-gesture suit, cont&#8217;d</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/miley-cyrus-eye-gesture-suit-contd/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 05:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miley Cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies film and videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unruh Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=9267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The suit mentioned earlier does raise the question: under California&#8217;s stringent anti-discrimination Unruh Act, does the entertainer really count as a &#8220;business establishment&#8221;? Tags: California, discrimination law, Miley Cyrus, movies film and videos, Unruh Act</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/miley-cyrus-eye-gesture-suit-contd/">Miley Cyrus eye-gesture suit, cont&#8217;d</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The suit <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2009/02/february-16-roundup/">mentioned earlier</a> does raise the question: under California&#8217;s stringent anti-discrimination Unruh Act, does the entertainer really <a href="http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Miley-s-Big-Business-But-Is-She-an-Establishment.html">count as a &#8220;business establishment&#8221;</a>? </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/california/" title="California" rel="tag">California</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/discrimination-law/" title="discrimination law" rel="tag">discrimination law</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/miley-cyrus/" title="Miley Cyrus" rel="tag">Miley Cyrus</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/movies-film-and-videos/" title="movies film and videos" rel="tag">movies film and videos</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/" title="Unruh Act" rel="tag">Unruh Act</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/02/miley-cyrus-eye-gesture-suit-contd/">Miley Cyrus eye-gesture suit, cont&#8217;d</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where&#8217;s his Mother&#8217;s Day present?</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/wheres-his-mothers-day-present/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/wheres-his-mothers-day-present/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 14:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladies' nights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unruh Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>More entrepreneurial lawyering in California: A Los Angeles psychologist who was denied a tote bag during a Mother&#8217;s Day giveaway at an Angel game is suing the baseball team, alleging sex and age discrimination. Michael Cohn&#8217;s class-action claim in Orange County Superior Court alleges that thousands of males and fans under 18 were &#8220;treated unequally&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/wheres-his-mothers-day-present/">Where&#8217;s &lt;i&gt;his&lt;/i&gt; Mother&#8217;s Day present?</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More entrepreneurial lawyering in California:</p>
<blockquote><p>A Los Angeles psychologist who was denied a tote bag during a Mother&#8217;s Day giveaway at an Angel game is suing the baseball team, alleging sex and age discrimination.</p>
<p>Michael Cohn&#8217;s class-action claim in Orange County Superior Court alleges that thousands of males and fans under 18 were &#8220;treated unequally&#8221; at a &#8220;Family Sunday&#8221; promotion last May and are entitled to $4,000 each in damages.</p></blockquote>
<p>(Dave McKibben, &#8220;L.A. Psychologist Who Didn&#8217;t Get Tote Bag at Mother&#8217;s Day Angel Game Files Lawsuit&#8221;, Los Angeles Times, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-suit11may11,0,7425075.story?coll=la-home-headlines">May 11</a>). Cohn&#8217;s attorney is Alfred Rava, who (as the L.A. Times really should have found out by <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/08/kiss_ladies_night_goodbye.html">Googling Overlawyered</a>, if not its own archives) was among the key figures in the 2003 spree by which owners of San Diego nightspots were hit up for handsome cash settlements for having held &#8220;Ladies&#8217; Night&#8221; promotions. The Unruh Act, California&#8217;s distinctively liberal civil rights statute, allows complainants to demand $4,000 a pop for such misdeeds, and it&#8217;s no defense to suggest that the customer&#8217;s primary reason for getting involved in the underlying transaction may have been to set up the $4,000 entitlement. <strong>More</strong>: &#8220;Lex Icon&#8221; wishes to make clear that he&#8217;s not the kind of lawyer who files cases like this (<a href="http://lexicon.typepad.com/lexicon/2006/05/im_not_that_kin.html">May 13</a>).</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/baseball/" title="baseball" rel="tag">baseball</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/class-actions/" title="class actions" rel="tag">class actions</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/ladies-nights/" title="ladies&#039; nights" rel="tag">ladies&#039; nights</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/san-diego/" title="San Diego" rel="tag">San Diego</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/sports/" title="sports" rel="tag">sports</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/unruh-act/" title="Unruh Act" rel="tag">Unruh Act</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/wheres-his-mothers-day-present/">Where&#8217;s &lt;i&gt;his&lt;/i&gt; Mother&#8217;s Day present?</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/wheres-his-mothers-day-present/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
