<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wisconsin &#8211; Overlawyered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 23:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>High court challenge to mandatory bar dues, cont&#8217;d</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/05/high-court-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues-contd/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2020 16:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=74124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A case awaiting acceptance by the Supreme Court challenges required fees paid by attorneys to State Bar of Wisconsin. Much of that money then goes to fund extensive lobbying. Trevor Burrus and Andrew Grossman comment.&#8221; [Cato Daily Podcast with Caleb Brown on Jarchow v. State Bar of Wisconsin, distributed for Supreme Court conference of May [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/05/high-court-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues-contd/">High court challenge to mandatory bar dues, cont&#8217;d</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://player.acast.com/cato-daily-podcast/episodes/jarchow-v-state-bar-wisconsin" frameBorder="0" width="100%" height="110px" allow="autoplay"></iframe></p>
<p>&#8220;A case awaiting acceptance by the Supreme Court challenges required fees paid by attorneys to State Bar of Wisconsin. Much of that money then goes to fund extensive lobbying. Trevor Burrus and Andrew Grossman comment.&#8221; [<a href="https://www.cato.org/multimedia/cato-daily-podcast/jarchow-v-state-bar-wisconsin">Cato Daily Podcast with Caleb Brown</a> on <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/jarchow-v-state-bar-of-wisconsin/">Jarchow v. State Bar of Wisconsin</a>, distributed for Supreme Court conference of May 15; <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/will-scotus-review-a-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues/">earlier</a>]</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/bar-associations/" title="bar associations" rel="tag">bar associations</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/first-amendment/" title="First Amendment" rel="tag">First Amendment</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/supreme-court/" title="Supreme Court" rel="tag">Supreme Court</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/05/high-court-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues-contd/">High court challenge to mandatory bar dues, cont&#8217;d</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will SCOTUS review a challenge to mandatory bar dues?</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/will-scotus-review-a-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/will-scotus-review-a-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73990</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Like a number of other states, Wisconsin by law requires lawyers to join and pay dues to its state bar, which takes stands on controversial issues. Two earlier SCOTUS cases upheld mandatory bar rules. Has the Janus decision changed that? [Deborah La Fetra, Ilya Shapiro, and Trevor Burrus on Cato certiorari brief in Jarchow v. [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/will-scotus-review-a-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues/">Will SCOTUS review a challenge to mandatory bar dues?</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like a number of other states, Wisconsin by law requires lawyers to join and pay dues to its state bar, which takes stands on controversial issues. Two earlier SCOTUS cases upheld mandatory bar rules. Has the Janus decision changed that? [<a href="https://www.cato.org/publications/legal-briefs/jarchow-v-state-bar-wisconsin">Deborah La Fetra, Ilya Shapiro, and Trevor Burrus</a> on Cato certiorari brief in <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/jarchow-v-state-bar-of-wisconsin/">Jarchow v. State Bar of Wisconsin</a>; <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/legal-us-otc-barassociation/next-stop-for-first-post-janus-challenge-to-mandatory-state-bar-dues-supreme-court-idUSKBN1YU169">Alison Frankel, Reuters</a>; <a href="https://reason.com/2020/02/18/are-laws-requiring-lawyers-to-join-and-fund-state-bar-associations-unconstitutional/">Eugene Volokh</a> (in second case seeking certiorari, Fleck v. Wetch, Eighth Circuit rejected challenge to North Dakota dues; <strong>and note update</strong> that Supreme Court has denied certiorari in that North Dakota case); earlier <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/10/lawyer-files-first-amendment-challenge-against-uses-of-louisiana-bar-dues/">here</a> (Louisiana challenge), <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/10/free-speech-roundup-95/">here</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/03/janus-what-comes-after/">here</a> (Texas)]  </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/bar-associations/" title="bar associations" rel="tag">bar associations</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/first-amendment/" title="First Amendment" rel="tag">First Amendment</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/north-dakota/" title="North Dakota" rel="tag">North Dakota</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/supreme-court/" title="Supreme Court" rel="tag">Supreme Court</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/will-scotus-review-a-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues/">Will SCOTUS review a challenge to mandatory bar dues?</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2020/03/will-scotus-review-a-challenge-to-mandatory-bar-dues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Unconscious People Can’t Consent to Police Searches&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/03/unconscious-people-cant-consent-to-police-searches/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/03/unconscious-people-cant-consent-to-police-searches/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=73097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Police officers in Wisconsin &#8220;drew Gerald Mitchell’s blood while he was unconscious—to test his blood alcohol content after a drunk-driving arrest. The state has attempted to excuse the officers by citing an implied-consent statute, which provides that simply driving on state roads constitutes consent to such searches.&#8221; Although the right to privacy are not absolute, [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/03/unconscious-people-cant-consent-to-police-searches/">&#8220;Unconscious People Can’t Consent to Police Searches&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Police officers in Wisconsin &#8220;drew Gerald Mitchell’s blood while he was unconscious—to test his blood alcohol content after a drunk-driving arrest. The state has attempted to excuse the officers by citing an implied-consent statute, which provides that simply driving on state roads constitutes consent to such searches.&#8221; Although the right to privacy are not absolute, there are problems with that approach, made worse by a strange Wisconsin Supreme Court opinion extending to highway searches a Fourth Amendment search exception for &#8220;pervasively regulated businesses.&#8221; [<a href="https://www.cato.org/blog/unconscious-people-cant-consent-police-searches">Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran</a> on Cato cert amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to review Mitchell v. Wisconsin]</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/fourth-amendment/" title="Fourth Amendment" rel="tag">Fourth Amendment</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/privacy/" title="privacy" rel="tag">privacy</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/03/unconscious-people-cant-consent-to-police-searches/">&#8220;Unconscious People Can’t Consent to Police Searches&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/03/unconscious-people-cant-consent-to-police-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free speech roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/02/free-speech-roundup-97/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/02/free-speech-roundup-97/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel slander and defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=72835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll pass the bill first, and let the courts tell us later whether it violates the First Amendment. That&#8217;s not how it&#8217;s supposed to work [my Free State Notes on a Maryland &#8220;cyberbullying&#8221; bill] Local laws requiring government contractors to disclose/disclaim ties to the anti-Israel BDS movement have rightly come under criticism. Will that spill [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/02/free-speech-roundup-97/">Free speech roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>We&#8217;ll pass the bill first, and let the courts tell us later whether it violates the First Amendment. That&#8217;s not how it&#8217;s supposed to work [<a href="https://freestatenotes.wordpress.com/2019/02/19/cyberbullying-and-the-constitution/">my Free State Notes</a> on a Maryland &#8220;cyberbullying&#8221; bill]  </li>
<li>Local laws requiring government contractors to disclose/disclaim ties to the anti-Israel BDS movement have rightly come under criticism. Will that spill over to a constitutionally dubious new Los Angeles ordinance requiring contractors to disclose ties with an advocacy group devoted to a different issue, the NRA? [<a href="https://reason.com/volokh/2019/02/13/los-angeles-demanding-that-city-contract">Eugene Volokh</a>]
 </li>
<li>&#8220;Lust on Trial,&#8221; new book by Amy Werbel on celebrated vice crusader Anthony Comstock [<a href="https://news.fitnyc.edu/2018/12/13/lust-on-trial/">Kurt Conklin with Alex Joseph, Hue</a> (Fashion Institute of Technology, NYC); podcasts at <a href="https://www.thefire.org/so-to-speak-podcast-lust-on-trial-with-amy-werbel/">FIRE with Nico Perrino</a> and <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/books/article/podcast_episode_079#When:12:20:00Z">ABA Journal with Lee Rawles</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;The Rushdie affair became a template for global intellectual terrorism&#8221; from Paris and Copenhagen to Garland, Tex.; in a different way, it also foreshadowed the far pettier heresy hunts and sanctity trials of callout culture [<a href="https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/02/14/the-chilling-legacy-of-the-rushdie-affair/">Jonathan Rauch</a>]  </li>
<li>$250 million libel suits as a fantasy way to own the libs? In real life meanwhile big-ticket libel suits are used to silence conservatives [<a href="https://cei.org/content/reporters-committee-freedom-press-aclu-dc-washington-post-fox-news-network-others-file">Competitive Enterprise Institute</a> press release (leading media orgs including RCFP, SPJ, ASNE support rehearing of D.C. court ruling favorable toward Michael Mann defamation action), <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/12/michael-mann-lawsuit-national-review-first-amendment/">NR editors</a>, <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/defending-free-speech-appeal-filed-in-national-review-v-mann/">Jack Fowler</a>]  &#8220;The media’s Covington coverage was appalling, but Nick Sandman’s libel lawsuit is not the answer&#8221; [<a href="https://reason.com/blog/2019/02/21/nick-sandmann-covington-lawsuit-libel">Robby Soave</a>, <a href="https://reason.com/volokh/2019/02/20/nick-sandmann-sues-washington-post-for-2">Irina Manta</a>] Another part of the forest: Justice Clarence Thomas criticizes New York Times v. Sullivan [<a href="https://reason.com/volokh/2019/02/19/justice-thomass-skepticism-of-new-york-t">Will Baude</a>, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-02-21/clarence-thomas-has-a-point-about-free-speech">Cass Sunstein</a>, <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/clarence-thomas-libel-law-supreme-court-rulings-first-amendment/">Ramesh Ponnuru</a>]   </li>
<li>&#8220;A new documentary showcased by PBS presents Montana as a success story of campaign finance reform and Wisconsin’s John Doe investigations as a failure.&#8221; But &#8220;Dark Money&#8221; has some omissions [<a href="https://www.cato.org/multimedia/cato-daily-podcast/dark-money-lawless-prosecutions">Cato Daily Podcast</a> with Caleb Brown and Steve Klein of the Pillar of Law Institute]
   </li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/bullying/" title="bullying" rel="tag">bullying</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/free-speech/" title="free speech" rel="tag">free speech</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/guns/" title="guns" rel="tag">guns</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/libel-slander-and-defamation/" title="libel slander and defamation" rel="tag">libel slander and defamation</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/los-angeles/" title="Los Angeles" rel="tag">Los Angeles</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/maryland/" title="Maryland" rel="tag">Maryland</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/montana/" title="Montana" rel="tag">Montana</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/02/free-speech-roundup-97/">Free speech roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2019/02/free-speech-roundup-97/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schools roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/schools-roundup-50/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/schools-roundup-50/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 10:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional reform litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school lunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=72651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Social justice education: on the march and coming to a school system near you [Frederick M. Hess and Grant Addison, National Review] New wave of institutional reform litigation aims to replace democratic oversight of public schools with governance by courts, lawyers, and NGOs [Dana Goldstein, New York Times] Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, trying to [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/schools-roundup-50/">Schools roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Social justice education: on the march and coming to a school system near you [<a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2018/11/12/higher-education-junk-science-wokeness/">Frederick M. Hess and Grant Addison, National Review</a>] </li>
<li>New wave of institutional reform litigation aims to replace democratic oversight of public schools with governance by courts, lawyers, and NGOs [<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/us/school-segregation-funding-lawsuits.html">Dana Goldstein, New York Times</a>]   </li>
<li>Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, trying to force a student to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance, ignores 75 years of Supreme Court precedent [<a href="https://reason.com/blog/2018/09/26/texas-attorney-general-ignores-75-years">Scott Shackford</a>] &#8220;My Daughter&#8217;s Middle School Plans to Teach Her Meek Compliance With Indiscriminate Invasions of Privacy&#8221; [<a href="https://reason.com/blog/2018/10/22/my-daughters-middle-school-plans-to-teac">Jacob Sullum</a>]  </li>
<li>&#8220;The Regressive Effects of Child-Care Regulations: More strenuous requirements raise child-care prices but have little apparent effect on quality&#8221; [<a href="https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/regulation/2018/9/regulation-v41n3-5.pdf">Ryan Bourne, Regulation</a> and <a href="http://www.governing.com/gov-institute/voices/col-child-care-cheaper-more-accessible-deregulation.html">Governing</a>]    </li>
<li>&#8220;Denver Schools Stopped ‘Lunch-Shaming’ Kids Whose Parents Didn’t Pay. The Results Were Predictable.&#8221; [<a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/08/denver-schools-end-lunch-shaming-unpaid-lunches-grow/">Hess and Addison</a>] </li>
<li>Wisconsin public union reform: &#8220;A school district’s implementation of Act 10 is associated with an increase in math proficiency on average.  The positive impact &#8230; is consistent across small town, rural, and suburban school districts.&#8221; [<a href="http://www.will-law.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/act-10-report-final.pdf">Will Flanders and Collin Roth, Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty</a>]   </li>
<li>&#8220;Look to the Dutch for true educational pluralism&#8221; [<a href="https://acton.org/pub/commentary/2018/09/12/look-dutch-true-educational-pluralism">Charles Glenn, Acton Institute</a>] </li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/institutional-reform-litigation/" title="institutional reform litigation" rel="tag">institutional reform litigation</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/netherlands/" title="Netherlands" rel="tag">Netherlands</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/public-employment/" title="public employment" rel="tag">public employment</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/school-lunch/" title="school lunch" rel="tag">school lunch</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/schools/" title="schools" rel="tag">schools</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/schools-roundup-50/">Schools roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/11/schools-roundup-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court sidelines gerrymander cases</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/court-sidelines-gerrymander-cases/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/court-sidelines-gerrymander-cases/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 04:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistricting reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=71288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By February, clues were in plain sight that the Supreme Court was not inclined to hand down a &#8220;big&#8221; landmark decision this term on gerrymandering. That was confirmed yesterday when the Court got both cases off its plate without reaching the merits, instead disposing of them for now on issues of standing (Gill v. Whitford, [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/court-sidelines-gerrymander-cases/">Court sidelines gerrymander cases</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By February, <a href="https://www.cato.org/blog/how-will-supreme-court-rule-partisan-gerrymandering">clues were in plain sight</a> that the Supreme Court was not inclined to hand down a &#8220;big&#8221; landmark decision this term on gerrymandering. That was confirmed yesterday when the Court got both cases off its plate without reaching the merits, instead disposing of them for now on issues of standing (<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1161_dc8f.pdf">Gill v. Whitford</a>, Wisconsin) and timing (<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-333_b97c.pdf">Benisek v. Lamone</a>, Maryland). Strikingly, both decisions were unanimous as to result, a clue as to the carefully limited scope of what was decided, and both cases can continue in the courts below with their legal theories mostly intact. &#8220;The Court has kicked the issue of partisan gerrymandering down the road. States shouldn’t,&#8221; I write in a <a href="https://www.cato.org/blog/partisan-gerrymandering-court-sends-both-cases-back-kitchen">new Cato commentary</a> on the decisions.</p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/maryland/" title="Maryland" rel="tag">Maryland</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/redistricting-reform/" title="redistricting reform" rel="tag">redistricting reform</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/supreme-court/" title="Supreme Court" rel="tag">Supreme Court</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/court-sidelines-gerrymander-cases/">Court sidelines gerrymander cases</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/06/court-sidelines-gerrymander-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin&#8217;s butter-grading scheme</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/wisconsins-butter-grading-scheme/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/wisconsins-butter-grading-scheme/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2018 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition through regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eat drink and be merry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=70244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin, where dairy producers hold great political sway, maintains a uniquely onerous scheme of butter grading that &#8220;has nothing to do with public health or nutrition&#8221; but does serve to restrict the sale of butter made in other states, including high-end artisanal butter. Representing Ohio&#8217;s Minerva Dairy, the Pacific Legal Foundation has sued to overturn [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/wisconsins-butter-grading-scheme/">Wisconsin&#8217;s butter-grading scheme</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin, where dairy producers hold great political sway, maintains a uniquely onerous scheme of butter grading that &#8220;has nothing to do with public health or nutrition&#8221; but does serve to restrict the sale of butter made in other states, including high-end artisanal butter. Representing Ohio&#8217;s Minerva Dairy, the Pacific Legal Foundation has sued to overturn the regulation on Commerce Clause, Due Process, and Equal Protection theories, and Cato has now filed a pun-strewn <a href="https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/wp-content/uploads/minerva_dairy_7th_cir.pdf">amicus</a> supporting the due process and equal protection claims [<a href="https://www.cato.org/blog/wisconsins-butter-scheme-udderly-cheesy">Ilya Shapiro and Matt Larosiere</a>] </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/cato-institute/" title="Cato Institute" rel="tag">Cato Institute</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/competition-through-regulation/" title="competition through regulation" rel="tag">competition through regulation</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/eat-drink-and-be-merry/" title="eat drink and be merry" rel="tag">eat drink and be merry</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/wisconsins-butter-grading-scheme/">Wisconsin&#8217;s butter-grading scheme</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/wisconsins-butter-grading-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Congress whiffs on curbing civil forfeiture&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/congress-whiffs-on-curbing-civil-forfeiture/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2018 18:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forfeiture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=70127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When Congress passed that big spending plan, an anticipated reform to civil forfeiture had been curiously abandoned. Darpana Sheth of the Institute for Justice comments&#8221; in this Cato Daily Podcast with Caleb Brown. On the other hand, there&#8217;s this from the state level: &#8220;Wisconsin joins Minnesota in signing law saying authorities now have to convict [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/congress-whiffs-on-curbing-civil-forfeiture/">&#8220;Congress whiffs on curbing civil forfeiture&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.cato.org/longtail-iframe/node/75719/field_longtail_player/0" width="448" height="252" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&#8220;When Congress passed that big spending plan, an anticipated reform to civil forfeiture had been curiously abandoned. Darpana Sheth of the Institute for Justice comments&#8221; in <a href="https://www.cato.org/multimedia/cato-daily-podcast/congress-whiffs-curbing-civil-forfeiture">this Cato Daily Podcast</a> with Caleb Brown.  </p>
<p>On the other hand, there&#8217;s this from the state level: &#8220;Wisconsin joins Minnesota in signing law saying authorities now have to convict you of a crime before they can take your cash&#8221; [<a href="https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/crime-and-courts/4427598-wisconsin-joins-minnesota-signing-law-saying-authorities-now-have">Christopher Ingraham, Washington Post/Grand Forks Herald</a>]  </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/forfeiture/" title="forfeiture" rel="tag">forfeiture</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/04/congress-whiffs-on-curbing-civil-forfeiture/">&#8220;Congress whiffs on curbing civil forfeiture&#8221;</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where the Justices, and states, might be headed on partisan gerrymandering</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/justices-states-might-headed-partisan-gerrymandering/</link>
					<comments>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/justices-states-might-headed-partisan-gerrymandering/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistricting reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WO writings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=68993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ballotpedia asked me to contribute to a mini-symposium on how the Supreme Court may deal with the partisan gerrymandering cases cases of Gill v. Whitford (Wisconsin) and Benisek v. Lamone (Maryland), and you can read the results here (see also my Cato write-up). Separately, I&#8217;m scheduled to testify in Annapolis on state-level proposals for redistricting [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/justices-states-might-headed-partisan-gerrymandering/">Where the Justices, and states, might be headed on partisan gerrymandering</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ballotpedia asked me to contribute to a mini-symposium on how the Supreme Court may deal with the partisan gerrymandering cases cases of Gill v. Whitford (Wisconsin) and Benisek v. Lamone (Maryland), and you can read the results <a href="https://ballotpedia.org/The_Ballot_Bulletin:_February_2018">here</a> (see also my <a href="https://www.cato.org/blog/how-will-supreme-court-rule-partisan-gerrymandering">Cato write-up</a>).</p>
<p>Separately, I&#8217;m scheduled to testify in Annapolis on state-level proposals for redistricting reform on Feb. 26 (House of Delegates) and March 1 (Senate). Come up and say hello afterward if you&#8217;re there. </p>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/maryland/" title="Maryland" rel="tag">Maryland</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/redistricting-reform/" title="redistricting reform" rel="tag">redistricting reform</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wo-writings/" title="WO writings" rel="tag">WO writings</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/justices-states-might-headed-partisan-gerrymandering/">Where the Justices, and states, might be headed on partisan gerrymandering</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.overlawyered.com/2018/02/justices-states-might-headed-partisan-gerrymandering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liability roundup</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/liability-roundup-36/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem jurisdictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.overlawyered.com/?p=67603</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Florida, California, St. Louis, New York asbestos courts, and Philadelphia top this year&#8217;s annual ATRA &#8220;Judicial Hellholes&#8221; list; Also getting attention, Louisiana, with legal climate ranked last among US states in business survey thanks in part to car-crash litigation, government-backed suits [Dee Thompson/Louisiana Record, local reform groups Louisiana Lawsuit Abuse Watch and Coalition for Common [&#8230;]</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/liability-roundup-36/">Liability roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Florida, California, St. Louis, New York asbestos courts, and Philadelphia top this year&#8217;s annual ATRA <a href="http://www.atra.org/2017/12/05/high-courts-contempt-lawmakers-authority-lawsuit-rackets-place-florida-atop-latest-judicial-hellholes-list/">&#8220;Judicial Hellholes&#8221; list</a>;   </li>
<li>Also getting attention, Louisiana, with legal climate ranked last among US states in business survey thanks in part to car-crash litigation, government-backed suits [<a href="https://louisianarecord.com/stories/511265673-louisiana-ranks-last-in-legal-climate-business-survey-finds">Dee Thompson/Louisiana Record</a>, local reform groups <a href="http://llaw.org/">Louisiana Lawsuit Abuse Watch</a> and <a href="http://www.coalitionforcommonsense.com/">Coalition for Common Sense</a>]      </li>
<li>Survey of last year&#8217;s (i.e. 2016&#8217;s) civil justice landscape [<a href="https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/2016-civil-justice-update">Andrew C. Cook, Federalist Society</a>]    </li>
<li>&#8220;Wheels come off fundamentally dishonest minibus claim&#8221; [<a href="https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/wheels-come-off-fundamentally-dishonest-minibus-claim/5063772.article">John Hyde, Law Gazette</a> (U.K.)]  </li>
<li>&#8220;Phoney Lawsuits: How To Sue Your Way Out Of College Debt&#8221; [<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/legalnewsline/2017/11/14/phoney-lawsuits-how-to-sue-your-way-out-of-college-debt/">John O&#8217;Brien, Legal NewsLine/Forbes</a>] Cold calls: insurers and agents wary of TCPA litigation [<a href="https://insurancenewsnet.com/innarticle/insurers-agents-greater-risk-expanding-tcpa-scope#.Wi62NUqnGUl">Cyril Tuohy, InsuranceNewsNet</a>] </li>
<li>Reform package introduced in Wisconsin legislature includes changes to discovery, class actions, statute of limitations [<a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wisconsin-legislators-push-to-simply-litigation-process/">Emily Zantow, Courthouse News</a>] </li>
</ul>

	<div class="st-post-tags ">
	Tags: <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/louisiana/" title="Louisiana" rel="tag">Louisiana</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/problem-jurisdictions/" title="problem jurisdictions" rel="tag">problem jurisdictions</a>, <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/tag/wisconsin/" title="Wisconsin" rel="tag">Wisconsin</a><br /></div>

<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2017/12/liability-roundup-36/">Liability roundup</a> is a post from <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
