…of EnviroPundit green building blog, for kindly nominating Overlawyered for Best Law Blog in the Weblog Awards 2005 nominations.
Archive for November, 2005
“Borat” welcomes Kazakh suit
Leading NC Democrat loses cerebral palsy case
Wade Byrd gave $100,000 in soft-money to John Edwards, and a personal-injury attorney at his firm was named chairman of the North Carolina Democratic Party, but Byrd failed to follow in Edwards’s footsteps in a recent cerebral palsy case when a jury that had sat through the five-week trial found for all of the defendants after an hour of deliberation. Byrd had sought $30 million from Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, two doctors, and a nurse who had the bad fortune to be present when Joseph O’Hara was born with severe brain damage. Though O’Hara had lesions on his placenta, and though there’s no relationship between C-sections and cerebral palsy rates, Byrd tried to claim that the fetal heart rate monitor showed wrongdoing. (James Romoser, “Doctors found not liable in baby’s brain damage”, Winston-Salem Journal, Nov. 23).
In other cerebral palsy litigation news, a clever group has reserved the web-domain AskTheDoc.org, and must be paying a fortune to advertise on Google for “cerebral palsy” search terms. While masquerading as medical advice (and the website does have some rudimentary resources), the website encourages parents of children born with cerebral palsy to believe that most cerebral palsy is caused by malpractice. It’s not clear if trial lawyers are behind the website (as they are with this similar site that fails to distinguish between “it’s” and “its” and is registered in the same state with a similar IP address), or if it’s just a spam source. The latter website gives some “indicators” that “a medical mistake may have caused your child’s cerebral palsy,” including “a specialist was called to care for your newborn.”
$3.36M for blind woman replaced by blind woman
Christine L. Boone was fired as director of the Pennsylvania Bureau of Blindness and Visual Services (allegedly for “insubordination” when she refused to carry out a superior’s directive regarding making a college aid program more available to students who weren’t receiving merit scholarships) and was replaced by another blind woman, Pamela Shaw. Nevertheless, Boone sued through her lawyer Arch Stokes, alleging that she was discriminated against because of her blindness, though the AP’s quote of Stokes’ opening statement of the federal trial before U.S. District Judge Sylvia H. Rambo makes it sound like a civil-service dispute. Boone only received $180,000 of the $1 million in the “future lost wages” she sought, but the $1.5 million for emotional distress should provide solace. Boone will ask the judge to reinstate her to her job; the AP did not get comment from Shaw, who currently holds the position. (Mark Scolforo, AP, Nov. 28; Mark Scolforo, AP/Boston Herald, Nov. 8). The National Federation of the Blind of Pennsylvania opposed Boone’s firing; that may or may not make it a bad decision, but a bad decision isn’t federally actionable, only a discriminatory one is.
George Will on campaign regulation
“Under Vermont’s limits, a candidate for state representative in a single-member district can spend no more than $2,000 in a two-year cycle. Every mile driven by a candidate—or a volunteer—must be computed as a 48.5-cent campaign expenditure. Just driving—and not much of it—can exhaust permissible spending.” (“Free Speech Under Siege”, Newsweek, Dec. 5). More: Aug. 23, etc.
Blogosphere on sleeping driver lawsuits – Melahn Parker, Lance Hall, and Joan Hall-Edwards v. Ford
John Hawkins, Craig Newmark, Haje Jan, David Svendsen, GM InsideNews, RightNation and their commenters aren’t impressed with the jury’s decision. Neither is the Henderson Daily Dispatch editorial board.
We covered the case Nov. 17.
Amazingly, a jury awarding $61 million in a ludicrous case like this is so “dog-bites-man” these days that there’s been no next-to-no follow-up press coverage, other than a Miami Herald profile of the plaintiff, Joan Hall-Edwards, that might as well have been a press release from the attorney; the story makes no effort to question whether the driver is to blame for falling asleep or losing control when he swerved after waking up from hitting the rumble strips or Hall for not wearing his seatbelt properly. (Susannah A. Nesmith, “Jury: Ford must pay for teen’s death”, Miami Herald, Nov. 18).
Today’s police chase lawsuit roundup III
- Antonio Chatman has already pled guilty to charges of fleeing police (the third time he’s been in trouble for doing so in his lengthy criminal history) and resisting arrest, but now claims that he jumped upon a Dumpster to give himself up, and sued the city of Johnstown and police officer Michael Page over its use of Obi, a police dog that bit him when he fought the apprehending dog. A jury didn’t buy his story.
On Thursday afternoon, Page shook hands with and thanked the jurors who cleared him. The 35-year-old also said the threat of a lawsuit can haunt officers as they make split-second decisions on the street.
“You have these type of things in the back of your mind,” Page said. “And unfortunately, that hesitation may cause me or somebody else to get hurt.”
Chatman’s attorneys argue that Page should have been equipped with a baton, though Page was over 50 feet away. (Mike Faher, “Jurors clear police dog”, Tribune-Democrat, Nov. 18; Id., “Police defend dog accused of biting”, Nov. 16; Id., “Officers testify in dog-bite lawsuit”, Nov. 15; Id., “Police-dog bite lawsuit begins”, Nov. 14). The district court had granted summary judgment, but the Third Circuit reversed (as the law required them to do) because of the “he said, he said” factual dispute. Unless Pennsylvania prosecutes Chatman for perjury, he will suffer no consequences for bringing the lawsuit.
- Patrick Sterling was fleeing police after being caught drag racing when he lost control of his Honda Civic and killed a thirteen-year-old pedestrian, Dennis Howard. So, of course, the family is suing the town of Orange. (Gerard A. Frank, “City faces lawsuit in boy’s death due to chase”, East Orange Record, Nov. 17; Scott Weinberger, “Family’s Claim About Cop Unfounded”, WCBS, Nov. 11).
- A Houston policeman complains about the safety implications of the city’s implementation of police-chase regulations. “Basically, that’s telling the crooks out there to just go on and do what you want and get away with it, because we’re not going to be chasing you.” The city denies that the revisions are the result of lawsuit fears, though it has been subjected to litigation over an innocent killed by a criminal fleeing police. (Jeff McShan, “HPD: To chase or not to chase”, KHOU, Nov. 23).
- An interview of a teenage car thief provides more support for the proposition that regulating police chases just encourages criminals to drive dangerously more often: “The police in the District would see us and chase us, but once they saw us go over 70 miles an hour they stopped.” In the words of one policeman, “If the [DC and Maryland] police were allowed to do their job and chase stolen cars, people wouldn’t run from the police. They don’t have this problem in Virginia. If you steal a car in Arlington, the Virginia State Police will chase you all the way to Georgia.” DC has gotten sufficiently lawless that Police Chief Charles Ramsey’s car has been stolen. (Michael Patrick Carney, “‘Don’t hurt me, I’m just a kid'”, Washingtonian, Dec. 2005).
Earlier coverage: Oct. 26; Mar. 29; Mar. 15 and links therein.
Online game blamed in Chinese teen’s death
“The parents of a 13 year-old boy who died falling from a building are suing World of Warcraft developer Blizzard, claiming that the massively-multiplayer online game is to blame for their son’s death. According to Chinese news agency Xinhua, the parents, who reside in the city of Tianjin, claim the boy jumped to his death whilst re-enacting a scene from the game. They are supported by Zhang Chunliang, a well-known activist whose campaign seeks to highlight the dangers of Internet addiction….There are more than 1.5 million World of Warcraft players in China — making up more than a third of the game’s worldwide subscriber base, even though the game only went on sale there in June.” (Ellie Gibson, “Parents set to sue Blizzard after World of Warcraft player dies”, GamesIndustry.biz, Nov. 21)(Joystiq.com thread). More on computer- and videogame suits: Oct. 21, Nov. 9, etc.
Update: Ed Fagan disciplinary hearings
Kate Coscarelli of the Newark Star-Ledger is covering them:
The brash-talking attorney was the focus of two days of disciplinary hearings that will ultimately decide whether he should be disbarred for mishandling client funds. The sometimes-contentious hearings were held …in a third-floor room at state Superior Court in Hackensack before retired Judge Arthur Minuskin, who is the special ethics master in the case.
The state Office of Attorney Ethics has charged Fagan with mishandling almost $400,000 in client funds, including money from two Holocaust survivors: Estelle Sapir, who got a large settlement from the Swiss banks, and Gizella Weisshaus, a Brooklyn woman who was the first survivor to sue the banks.
(“Holocaust lawyer fights his own court battle”, Nov. 17). More on attorney Edward Fagan: Aug. 27, Jun. 4 and many more.
Illinois State Bar Association takes action
The Illinois State Bar Association has found that people in focus groups are upset about the miscarriages of justice that occur in Madison County and corruption in the system, and have been motivated to take action. So are they going to clean up the system and support reform? No! Rather, they hope to have a million-dollar advertising campaign to improve the image of attorneys and engage in more market research. (Gail Applebaum, “State Bar may advertise to help lawyers”, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Nov. 23). In the press account, ISBA official David Anderson disingenuously argues that Madison County isn’t a judicial hellhole because of the number of medical malpractice verdicts—ignoring that the number of med-mal verdicts has nothing to do with Madison County’s deservedly poor reputation.