“After walking past her husband’s silent gaze in a courthouse hallway, the woman testified that she knew of plans by her daughter and her husband to frame [teacher] Danny Cuesta, 30, for rape. She said it was part of a scam to sue the North Babylon School District.” NB, however, that the witness is going through a divorce with her husband, and the prosecutors are alleging that the mother participated in the teacher’s cover-up. (Alfonso A. Castillo, Newsday, Oct. 18; AP/WSYR, Oct. 4).
Archive for October, 2006
“EU to regulate video blogs?”
A new European Commission proposal would require Web sites and mobile phone services that feature video images to conform to standards set by that body, the Times of London reports. …
Shaun Woodward, the U.K. broadcasting minister, described the draft proposal as catastrophic, saying it could end up forcing someone to get a license to post videos of an amateur rugby team.
(CNet Blogma, Oct. 18). And here’s the Times Online:
Personal websites would have to be licensed as a “television-like service”.
Viviane Reding, the Media Commissioner, argues that the purpose is simply to set minimum standards on areas such as advertising, hate speech and the protection of children.
(Adam Sherwin, “Amateur ‘video bloggers’ under threat from EU broadcast rules”, Times Online, Oct. 17). However, there are some indications that the EU bureaucracy itself intends a less sweeping definition of the law’s application than that: Nate Anderson, ArsTechnica, Oct. 18.
Dr. Lawrence M. Poliner v. Presbyterian Hospital update
The ludicrous $366 million award on a conspiracy theory (Aug. 30, 2004; Sep. 2, 2004) was, as we predicted reduced by remittitur to a still ludicrous $22.5 million. (Plaintiff’s attorney’s press release, Sep. 21). Kevin M.D.’s commenters note that the trial bar simultaneously complains that doctors don’t do enough to police themselves and then hold doctors liable for policing other doctors.
Note that the doctors whom the verdict was issued against weren’t even the ones on the peer review committee that suspended Dr. Poliner’s privileges for a few months; they were just the ones who started the peer-review process.
“Trial Lawyers Inc. — Illinois”
At Point of Law (Oct. 18), Jim Copland announces a new report from the Manhattan Institute’s Trial Lawyers Inc. project:
This afternoon, the Manhattan Institute released Trial Lawyers, Inc.: Illinois, A Report on the Lawsuit Industry in Illinois 2006. The first comprehensive look at litigation in the Prairie State, the report synthesizes work done by the Illinois Civil Justice League, American Tort Reform Association, and U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, among others. The report also includes new information, such as the percentage of 2004 contributions to the Illinois State Democratic Party that came from plaintiffs’ lawyers and their firms (78 percent) and Illinois’ quantitative rank in terms of its medical-malpractice liability as a percentage of gross state product (49th of the 50 states) and its corporations’ self-insured liability as a percentage of GSP (48th).
The Madison County Record has already reported on the new study here.
More coverage: Adam Jadhav, “Metro East courts have improved somewhat, think tank concludes”, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Oct. 19.
New Times column — age-bias law
My new column in the Times Online is up. First paragraph:
So now Britain has its own law banning employers from considering workers’ age in most job situations. If your experience follows ours in America, the results will include a range of unintended consequences, some of which will worsen the plight of the workers the law was meant to help.
(Walter Olson, “If the US experience is anything to go by, be sceptical of Britain’s new age-bias laws”, Times Online (U.K.), Oct. 18, newer link and reprint). I treated this subject at length in my 1997 book The Excuse Factory and did a USA Today opinion piece back then exploring some of the ways the law backfires against older workers. The new British law has been getting some attention in the States, in part because of the news item about the company that has banned office birthday cards as potentially ageist (Oct. 13) and the one about the recruiting agency (Oct. 17) that is barring use of any of a list of words including vibrant, dynamic, gravitas, ambitious, and hungry to describe potential employees.
Tag, you’re out
The game, that is: “Officials at the Willett Elementary School in Attleboro [southwest of Boston] have banned playground tag, touch football and any other unsupervised chasing games over concerns about the risk of injury and liability for the school.” (“Attleboro elementary school bans tag”, AP/Boston Globe, Oct. 18)(more on lawsuit-fearing fun-busters).
Come to Brooklyn, the suing’s fine
Here’s the top elected official in Brooklyn promoting one of his borough’s few truly prosperous industries:
“If you like white-shoe law firms, stay in Manhattan,” said Brooklyn’s borough president Marty Markowitz, who attended the bank’s grand opening. “But if you’re looking for the biggest settlement, come to Brooklyn.”
“The bank” in this case is Esquire Bank, which as Peter Lattman of the WSJ law blog explains (Oct. 10):
[claims] to be the first bank in the country to specialize in serving trial lawyers. It’s located on Court Street in Brooklyn’s judicial epicenter. To some folks in these parts, a “Court Street lawyer” has the pejorative connotation of an ambulance-chasing, personal injury attorney.
Another highlight of Lattman’s account: a quote from an attorney who operates the website moneyforpain.com.
When schools fall short
Australia: “A settlement between a leading Melbourne private school and a parent who said her child had not been taught to read properly could result in increased litigation between parents and schools, a principals group has warned.” Yvonne Meyer faulted Brighton Grammar School for not placing enough emphasis on phonics-based instruction for her child. (David Rood and Chee Chee Leung, “Litigation warning as private school settles complaint over child’s literacy”, Melbourne Age, Aug. 16; Ewin Hannan and Justine Ferrari, “Private schools to curtail promises”, The Australian, Aug. 16). And in France: “A French schoolboy [Jérome Charasse] has successfully sued the government after blaming his failure in a philosophy exam on his teacher’s frequent absences during strikes. Parents’ groups and teaching unions believe the decision by a court in Clermont-Ferrand will lead to many similar cases.” (Colin Randall, ” Boy wins court case over striking teacher”, Daily Telegraph, Jun. 22)(h/t D.N.).
Trespassers and skylights, UK edition
“The Sleeping Pill Ate My Homework”
CEI’s Greg Conko on the growing use of Ambien as an excuse, the questionable resulting class action, complete with low-brow tv-talk-show trolling for “victims.”