New reader letters

Latest batch includes letters upbraiding us for our ignorance of the Olympic sport of curling; calculating the impact of head-on crashes; wondering about how things may look when judges get awards; and offering a proposal for trial lawyer accountability. As an experiment, we have occasionally been enabling comments to entries in our letters section. In […]

Latest batch includes letters upbraiding us for our ignorance of the Olympic sport of curling; calculating the impact of head-on crashes; wondering about how things may look when judges get awards; and offering a proposal for trial lawyer accountability.

As an experiment, we have occasionally been enabling comments to entries in our letters section. In the case of the letter we ran Dec. 14 on the Schwartz v. Citibank late-fee class action, this resulted in more reader discussion than we could have anticipated, with more than 80 readers putting in their two cents (or 5 cents, or 17 cents, depending on how big their refund was from the legal settlement). We’ve now closed the comments, but left the discussion intact.

Comments are closed.