Yesterday’s extraordinary one-year stay of enforcement on testing/certification by the CPSC was, if nothing else, a tribute to the energy of an extraordinary grass-roots movement that emerged over the past two months and made its voice heard around the country and above all in Congress. It will rightfully be cause for celebration by thousands of businesses whose inventories of books, toys, garments and other childrens’ goods have now suddenly not been rendered valueless and which can continue making selling their wares after Feb. 10, not indeed without legal worries, but at least without being in blatant defiance of the responsible federal agency, the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

After the hugs and confetti-throwing have subsided, there will be time to examine the many ways this relief falls short of solving the CPSIA problem, while leaving product makers and retailers exposed in serious legal ways over the next twelve months as well as afterward.

In the mean time, let us note that while some sectors of the media flopped utterly in covering CPSIA in recent weeks, others distinguished themselves, with much good coverage appearing in local newspapers and also local television (the latter often belittled as a source of original reporting). Above all, this was a triumph of social media: blogs both big and small (including the 350+ who participated in CPSIA Blogging Day on Wednesday), forums (at places like Fashion Incubator and Etsy), and Twitter (which proved its worth as a means of putting concerned people in touch with each other, spreading word about useful articles, documents and resources, and serving as an early alert system on news developments).

(Public domain illustration: Grandma’s Graphics).


  • While I am very happy to hear of a “stay” or some “modifications” to CPSIA, I feel that we may just be cutting off the crusts of a very large CRAP sandwich.
    The CPSC, not unlike a scene out of the movie “Minority Report”, has in the past labeled products that have never hurt a child as “possible of causing harm”. To give, basically a group chaired by many from the JPMA, the ability to aggressively go after what they “think” may be a problem, will be a problem. It all sounds like a huge competition leveling move by the wrong people. Fine or jail those who were found to be using lead, and save America a few hundred million dollars. More government regulation of any kind is not what we need. Common sense tactics is what is needed and getting “some” things changed looks like a classic “bait and switch” move.

  • Doesn’t sound like this really changes anything if state attorney general’s can enforce this law. Who is going to want to run afoul of this? Could not RI AG (for instance) parse out the enforcement to his buddies ala RIAA?

  • Let us just hope that within the next year this can be resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. According to everything that I have read, the law can’t just be deleted….it can only be modified. So let the modification begin.

  • Thanks for a great synopsis of the current situation we are in. It was definitely an awesome grass-roots movement. We have accomplished so much and yet still have so far to go. Getting ready for round two!

  • […] Walter, Overlawyered (Jan 31, 09): “After the hugs and confetti-throwing have subsided, there will be time to examine the many […]

  • […] Prof Blog) has written a three-page summary memo (PDF) on the CPSC enforcement stay announced Friday. Earlier in the week, he notes, the National Association of Manufacturers had petitioned (PDF) for […]

  • […] often it is someone overreacting, but in this case the more I looked the worse the law looked. As Overlawyered points out, this isn’t over yet but I do hope that everyone that who emailed me keeps the pressure up on Congress to get this one […]

  • […] CPSIA Stay II […]