• “Woman Sues Adidas After Fall She Blames on Sticky Shoes” [Lowering the Bar]
• Texas lawmakers file loser pays proposals [SE Tex Record] Actual scope of proposals hard to discern through funhouse lens of NYT reporting [PoL] Marie Gryphon testimony on loser-pays proposals in Arkansas [Manhattan Institute, related]
• Google awarded patent on changing of logo for special days [Engadget via Coyote]
• “Civil Gideon in Deadbeat Dad Cases Would Be ‘Massive’ Change, Lawyer Tells Justices” [Weiss, ABA Journal, Legal Ethics Forum]
• Amateur-hour crash-fakers in Bronx didn’t reckon on store surveillance camera [NY Post]
• “Plaintiffs’ Lawyers in Cobell Defend $223M Fee Request” [BLT]
• Show of harm not needed: FDA kicks another 500 or so legacy drugs off market, this time in the cold-and-cough area [WaPo]
• “Wal-Mart v. Dukes: Rough Justice Without Due Process” [Andrew Trask, WLF]

Filed under: Arkansas, civil gideon, crash faking, FDA, Google, loser pays, patent quality, product liability, slip and fall, Texas, Wal-Mart v. Dukes