“Although the marriage did not last, plaintiff’s fury over the quality of the photos and video continued on.” The photographer defendant thinks the demand for $48,000 to re-stage the wedding is a bit much, especially given that the former bride has thought to have returned to her native Latvia. [New York Times; Above the Law (groom’s father is partner in big law firm)]
One Comment
Beyond the obvious need for Loser Pays here, this case is an example of misusng the courts as an agent for stalking of the beautiful ex-wife, who has fled the US to parts unknown in Latvia.
I am sure her divorce papers contain some interesting reading.