Overlawyered: Chronicling The High Cost Of Our Legal System
  • About
  • Accolades
  • Archives
  • Cato

Argument: plaintiff should have used marijuana after crash

A court in British Columbia, Canada, has declined to reduce a plaintiff’s damages on the theory she could have alleviated symptoms after a collision by using medical marijuana but didn’t. [Erik Magraken] More: Ron Miller.

Filed under: Canada, damages, illegal drugs

  • By Walter Olson
  • March 6, 2014
  • One Comment

One Comment

  • Must have mistaken the plaintiff for a NY Assemblyman.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2573598/Strong-laid-young-ones-Embarrassing-footage-emerges-New-York-politician-ogling-young-women-holiday.html

    • March 06, 2014 6:32 PM
    • By wfjag

Search

Browse by Tag

Walter’s Books

  • The Litigation Explosion
  • The Excuse Factory
  • The Rule of Lawyers
  • Schools for Misrule

Recent Posts

  • A good run: Overlawyered, 1999-2020
  • Searching the Overlawyered archives
  • Best of Overlawyered
  • Detective: fraudsters broke limbs of supposed crash victims
  • Argue & Phibbs, solicitors
Cato Institute Logo

1000 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington D.C. 20001-5403
Telephone (202) 842-0200
Privacy Policy