- Post-election roundup from me and Walter. [Point of Law]
- Black helicopter crowd calls 90-10 Amendment E (Oct. 27) loss a fraudulent conspiracy. [Lattman]
- University of Michigan seeks to engage in frivolous litigation to strike down measure barring racial preferences. [Bernstein @ Volokh]
- Patron drinks, dances on bar, sues bar when she falls down. [Above the Law; Lattman; TortsProf]
- Can KFed use custody battle to renegotiate “ironclad” prenup? (NB that, unless prenup says otherwise, Britney Spears may be required to spring for Federline’s attorneys.) [TMZ via Defamer]
- Speaking of which, here’s a divorce case with a legal bill of $3M and counting. [Forbes]
- The litigious Michael Crook, unhappy that others are posting screen-caps of his mug. [Boing Boing]
- “Sometimes patients and their families DON’T want to hear good news.” A tale of a Social Security disability seeker. [Rangel]
November 8 roundup
Post-election roundup from me and Walter. [Point of Law] Black helicopter crowd calls 90-10 Amendment E (Oct. 27) loss a fraudulent conspiracy. [Lattman] University of Michigan seeks to engage in frivolous litigation to strike down measure barring racial preferences. [Bernstein @ Volokh] Patron drinks, dances on bar, sues bar when she falls down. [Above the […]
Comments are closed.